Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clive

This emphasis on 'divided' puzzles me. What did the voting numbers look like when the USA was 'undivided'?


5 posted on 11/04/2004 4:33:20 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dudoight
This emphasis on 'divided' puzzles me. What did the voting numbers look like when the USA was 'undivided'? That's mediaspeak for "we lost control of the House, Senate, and the presidencey, but you still have to advance our agenda anyways". -R
9 posted on 11/04/2004 4:43:57 AM PST by talosiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dudoight
"This emphasis on 'divided' puzzles me. What did the voting numbers look like when the USA was 'undivided'?"

Licia would agree with you.

If popular mandate, one based on numbers, means anything (once the election is decided) in a congressional federal system, Bush has a mandate that has not been obtained by any previous president.

12 posted on 11/04/2004 5:05:30 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson