To: The_Macallan
Who would even bother to pull up the properties page on a small inset photo like that. This was a setup!
To: Doc Savage
I check properties.
I have teh status bar up on my web browser, and when I see that it's loading something titled weird, I check what it is.
170 posted on
11/04/2004 6:45:16 AM PST by
Darksheare
(Democrats make for excellent lemming studies.)
To: Doc Savage
Who would even bother to pull up the properties page on a small inset photo like that. This was a setup!
No. That does not imply a setup. I often save images to my local system and when i do, I'm in the habit of checking the file name - mostly so I don't accidently overwrite another image with the same name (unix - not Windows). Properties tag is only one way of seeing the evidence.
171 posted on
11/04/2004 6:48:49 AM PST by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: Doc Savage
"Who would even bother to pull up the properties page on a small inset photo like that. This was a setup!"
Setup?? Setup for what?
This was no setup. This is what CNN thinks of George Bush. They were caught.
As to who would bother to pull up the properties page-- I do that frequently. Maybe I'll use it in order to post a link to a board such as this, but most often I paste the properties into the browser to see if there is a larger image to look at.
Sheeeese........
To: Doc Savage
"Who would even bother to pull up the properties page on a small inset photo like that. This was a setup!"
Some people, (like me), save a lot of graphics from the web. When you right click to save the image, it shows up. This is not a setup, I mirrored both web pages to my hard drive for hard evidence that it existed. They just got caught and changed it when the complaints started filing in.
174 posted on
11/04/2004 6:53:15 AM PST by
DocRock
(If you have bandwidth, I have a lot of reference material on my homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson