To: topher
I bet PP has already picked the judge to overturn it.
2 posted on
11/02/2004 5:35:45 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: AppyPappy
I bet PP has already picked the judge to overturn it. In 1999, Louisiana passed a law to have health inspections at Abortion Clinics. NARAL (and I believe Planned Parenthood) blocked this law until January of 2004.
Apparently, they are against safe abortions and clean abortion facilities.
3 posted on
11/02/2004 5:39:07 AM PST by
topher
To: AppyPappy
Trying to defeat it at the polls is only the first step in the PP strategy. It goes strait from the ballot box to the courts.
I don't see how anybody can be against a parental notification requirement that includes a judicial review. This one should be a no-brainer, no matter where one falls on the issue of Roe v. Wade.
4 posted on
11/02/2004 5:40:49 AM PST by
gridlock
(BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
To: AppyPappy
"I bet PP has already picked the judge to overturn it."
They *can't* - that's the point.
The FL legislature has passed several parental notification laws over the years, and the FL Supreme Court has ruled that each of them violated the FL Constitution, saying that these laws conflicted with minors' right to privacy as enumerated in the FL Constitution. (Unlike the U.S. Constitution, the FL Constitution explicitly stipulates a right to privacy.)
After being stymied for all of these years, some members of the FL Legislature sponsored this amendment. If it passes, it will AMEND the FL Constitution to state that parental notification prior to an abortion does NOT conflict with a minor's right to privacy stipulated elsewhere in the FL Constitution. (Take that, FL Supremes!)
This amendment would also specifically permit the Legislature to pass a parental notification law, so long as the law contains a judicial bypass (i.e., allowing a judge to consent to a minor's abortion if the minor can show good reason not to notify the parents). The Legislature would still need to pass a new parental notification law complying with the terms of this constitutional amendment before any parental notification requirement can go into effect.
Thus, if this amendment passes, the FL Supreme Court's hands will be tied, unless they can trump up some other "conflict" with the FL Constitution. The only other way for PP to prevent this would be a U.S. Supreme Court challenge, but I think that there are other states that already have parental notification laws that have passed muster with the U.S. Supreme Court. So, the FL Legislature should have some models to work from in constructing a parental notification law that will withstand the federal courts.
I sure hope that Amendment #1 passes!
10 posted on
11/02/2004 5:53:50 AM PST by
lasisra
(Go W!)
To: AppyPappy
Are they going to show movies of the murder of little babies for money?
PP has no redeeming qualities.
14 posted on
11/02/2004 6:06:39 AM PST by
chiefqc
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson