Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

Trying to defeat it at the polls is only the first step in the PP strategy. It goes strait from the ballot box to the courts.

I don't see how anybody can be against a parental notification requirement that includes a judicial review. This one should be a no-brainer, no matter where one falls on the issue of Roe v. Wade.


4 posted on 11/02/2004 5:40:49 AM PST by gridlock (BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
I don't see how anybody can be against a parental notification requirement that includes a judicial review. This one should be a no-brainer, no matter where one falls on the issue of Roe v. Wade.

I agree, but look at the damning article by LDI. It shows how Planned Parenthood was more interested in money than anything else...

Note that Planned Parenthood gets taxpayer's dollars to do this, and is STRONGLY supported by the United Way.

Remember, these folks believe in abusing girls the United Way.

6 posted on 11/02/2004 5:44:06 AM PST by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson