Posted on 11/01/2004 7:40:00 AM PST by SmithL
Washington -- Sen. Tom Daschle, the nation's top elected Democrat, is in dire danger of losing his South Dakota seat in one of the tightest of nine Senate races that will determine control of the powerful upper chamber.
Former Rep. John Thune is in a dead heat with Daschle in their farming state where the two campaigns and their outside allies have lavished $40 million on fewer than a half a million voters.
Thune is a popular candidate who gave up a quest for the governorship at the urging of the Bush White House to run for the Senate in 2002. He lost to Democrat Tim Johnson by just 524 votes.
In fact, a strange outcome could be brewing for the Senate: Republicans could increase their 51-48 edge by two or even four seats -- even if President Bush loses to his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, said Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.
That's because the partisan passions aroused by the cliffhanger presidential race could produce big coattails for both parties to grab -- but that works to the GOP's advantage because most of the close Senate contests are deep in Republican territory.
Control of the Senate gives the majority party immense power over the nation's political agenda, including confirmation of nominees to the Supreme Court and other federal benches.
Although the power of the majority is weakened by the filibuster, a Senate rule that allows the minority to block legislation unless proponents can muster a 60-vote supermajority, having the majority determines the leadership of the powerful committees that write legislation.
For Democrats to gain control of the Senate, they need to win seven of the nine tightly contested seats.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Don't let the door hit you on the @$$ on your way out, Tommy Boy.
Daschle Democrat dire danger Dakota determine
That's a lot of Ds for one sentence. Hopefully, to be followed by "Da agony of defeat."
You beat me to it. That was exactly the thought that popped into my head.
Not going to happen.
People in hell want ice water, also.
Neither of these things are going to happen.
How many Republicans do you think we need to break the judicial fillibuster? If we go up to 55 or 56 seats, the (new) minority leader would have to have pretty tight reigns to maintain the fillibuster. Only 4-5 would have to break.
I hope for nothing more than a Bush victory and a near super majority in the Senate so we can get some non-activist judges aboard in the next four years.
If we can get to 56 seats, I think things will roll pretty smooth for the SCOTUS battles that will happen next year.
Lighten up. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.