[TBarnett34]

No deep thinking in your comments.

I'm sick of the trolls, and I don't care whether they're Democrats or "Libertarians." For the sake of the next four years, a vote against Bush is a vote against conservatism.

Keep in mind the small margins by which Bush won Floriduh and Gore won New Mexico in 2000. What if those 500+ voters in Florida had voted for Browne? What if the 300+ votes in New Mexico that made the difference in that state had been cast for Buchanan?

Contrary to your opinion, I'm not 'attacking' freedom. I'm attempting to preserve it by keeping John F'n Kerry out of the Oval Office. The action of casting a vote against Bush, whether it's for Kerry, Peroutka, or Badnarik, is the true attack on freedom in this election.

[Protagoras]

Another genius who thinks he/she can persuade others to agree with HIM/HER by insulting them.

[Kleon]

The action of casting a vote against Bush, whether it's for Kerry, Peroutka, or Badnarik, is the true attack on freedom in this election.

No, trying to scare others into voting for your candidate is the true attack on freedom. Voting for who you want is exercising that freedom.

[ActionNewsBill]

For the sake of the next four years, a vote against Bush is a vote against conservatism.

When did the President become a "Conservative"?