To: Perdogg
What the hell are the Indians flying, Fokker Eindeckers? Don't they have at least rudimentary armament? They should've carpeted the joint with every ounce of ordinance they were carrying, fer crying out loud.......
8 posted on
10/30/2004 5:29:11 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
To: Viking2002
What the hell are the Indians flying, Fokker Eindeckers? You need to read about the recent air exercise/dogfight between (I believe it was) Indian Mig-29s and U.S. (probably) F-15s or F-18s. IAF won hands down. US fighters were handicapped without use of AWACS but result was decidedly lopsided. Pukin Dog or someone will provide more accurate details. Not a force to be diminished.
15 posted on
10/30/2004 5:36:36 PM PDT by
steve86
To: Viking2002
Since you mentioned eindecker, I had to post a pic of one:
28 posted on
10/30/2004 6:35:06 PM PDT by
Lockbar
(March toward the sound of the guns.)
To: Viking2002
Even a wooden mallet would have been better than nothing:
32 posted on
10/30/2004 8:18:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
To: Viking2002
Surveillance airplanes/drones are not normally armed.
37 posted on
10/30/2004 8:41:24 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
To: Viking2002
Surveillance airplanes/drones are not normally armed.
38 posted on
10/30/2004 8:41:31 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
To: Viking2002
42 posted on
10/30/2004 8:53:51 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson