Skip to comments.
Oglala order could prevent GOP poll watching on Pine Ridge Reservation (South Dakota Fraud Alert)
Aberdeen American News ^
| Fri, Oct. 29, 2004
| Carson Walker
Posted on 10/30/2004 9:02:00 AM PDT by Pardon Me
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
10/30/2004 9:02:01 AM PDT
by
Pardon Me
To: Pardon Me
Well, since this is where the majority of the fraud happened in 2000, this works out swell for little Tommy, doesn't it?
2
posted on
10/30/2004 9:04:10 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
To: Pardon Me
Bump and the fun continues.
3
posted on
10/30/2004 9:04:40 AM PDT
by
jokar
(On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
To: Pardon Me
Remember the last Senatorial election in SD? Thune was tied and all of a sudden, votes from one area arrived and were almost all cast for the democrat. It was an area where Thune was expected to have an edge.
4
posted on
10/30/2004 9:07:32 AM PDT
by
Trepz
To: Trepz
This is the same area of the state! Isn't this just swell!
5
posted on
10/30/2004 9:09:26 AM PDT
by
Pardon Me
(Dump Daschle-Dump Daschle-DumpDaschle-DumpDaschle-DumpDaschle......)
To: Howlin

(Ms. Kaiser Sose): "Listen, Short one, do not worry about any threats to our plans.
Did they even touch Sandy Berger or any of us?
We control more than one hundred stolen FBI files
-- I mean 'badges of honor' -- on important officials in your state
so no one will EVER DARE touch any of us.
Now bring out our dead to vote, or I have just three words for you and them."


6
posted on
10/30/2004 9:14:18 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
To: Pardon Me
7
posted on
10/30/2004 9:14:39 AM PDT
by
sdpatriot
To: Pardon Me
Well then I guess that we will not count their votes huh!
8
posted on
10/30/2004 9:14:54 AM PDT
by
zzen01
To: Pardon Me
Looks like the Dead will get to vote again!
9
posted on
10/30/2004 9:15:00 AM PDT
by
jocko12
To: Pardon Me
This is a US federal election, not a Sioux election. They need to appeal this to the federal courts immediately.
To: Pardon Me; Congressman Billybob
So, the "official" democrat party response, through this supposed "independent group's leader" is that the repubbies are supposed to make specific claims of wrong-doing, and, without those specific claims, there was no illegal activity.
And, just to make sure there are no claims, the democrats get a hand-picked (tribal judge?) democrat to write a disjointed, poorly-written, over-broad restriction order AGAINST ANYBODY (anybody who is not from a democrat party lawyer that is!) from observing the polling place (NOT "private property"!) so they can OBSERVE (potential) illegal action so they can to make a statement claiming illegal activities to allow them to substantiate their claim.
But the claim of illegal activity by the democrats (according to the democrats' spokesman!) MUST be made without having video to capture evidence.
11
posted on
10/30/2004 9:15:25 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Pardon Me
This clown only has this authority if he involks his "independant nation" status.
If that status holds, then participation in "our" election is forsaken.
12
posted on
10/30/2004 9:15:46 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Support John Thune!)
To: Pardon Me
A good place for FEDERAL election monitors.
13
posted on
10/30/2004 9:21:56 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
To: Lunkhead_01
This is a US federal election, not a Sioux election. Exactly, either they can abide by FEDERAL election rules, or the polling place must be closed; and the indians can vote on state soil, where the laws are observed.
14
posted on
10/30/2004 9:25:38 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Pardon Me
A "tribal judge" decides who can monitor the polls in a FEDERAL election? Will an Iman in Dearborn decree that sharia denies women the vote in this election?
To: Pardon Me
If the Indians are in their own country they shouldn't be voting in U.S. elections.
16
posted on
10/30/2004 9:42:54 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: Pardon Me
Then the indians are going to have to go to an off reservation polling place if they wish to participate in federal elections. If the polls can not be observed, then it's safe to say they can not be judged to be fair.
17
posted on
10/30/2004 9:47:45 AM PDT
by
McGavin999
(We have planted the seeds of democracy and watered them with our blood, now let freedom reign)
To: Pardon Me
Oh wait, I have an idea. If there can not be republican poll watchers there, perhaps federal marshalls can fill the void.
18
posted on
10/30/2004 9:48:38 AM PDT
by
McGavin999
(We have planted the seeds of democracy and watered them with our blood, now let freedom reign)
To: Pardon Me
But if they allow poll watchers, then they couldn't vote as often as they like. People can vote as many times as they like in Chicago and St. Louis, why not the reservations? Doesn't sound fair.
To: Pardon Me
Question: Can anyone explain to me why these f*ck*rs vote democrat?
20
posted on
10/30/2004 10:12:34 AM PDT
by
SaintDismas
(Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson