Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oglala order could prevent GOP poll watching on Pine Ridge Reservation (South Dakota Fraud Alert)
Aberdeen American News ^ | Fri, Oct. 29, 2004 | Carson Walker

Posted on 10/30/2004 9:02:00 AM PDT by Pardon Me

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/30/2004 9:02:01 AM PDT by Pardon Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Well, since this is where the majority of the fraud happened in 2000, this works out swell for little Tommy, doesn't it?


2 posted on 10/30/2004 9:04:10 AM PDT by Howlin (Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Bump and the fun continues.


3 posted on 10/30/2004 9:04:40 AM PDT by jokar (On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Remember the last Senatorial election in SD? Thune was tied and all of a sudden, votes from one area arrived and were almost all cast for the democrat. It was an area where Thune was expected to have an edge.


4 posted on 10/30/2004 9:07:32 AM PDT by Trepz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trepz

This is the same area of the state! Isn't this just swell!


5 posted on 10/30/2004 9:09:26 AM PDT by Pardon Me (Dump Daschle-Dump Daschle-DumpDaschle-DumpDaschle-DumpDaschle......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

(Ms. Kaiser Sose): "Listen, Short one, do not worry about any threats to our plans.
Did they even touch Sandy Berger or any of us?
We control more than one hundred stolen FBI files
-- I mean 'badges of honor' -- on important officials in your state
so no one will EVER DARE touch any of us.
Now bring out our dead to vote, or I have just three words for you and them.
"


6 posted on 10/30/2004 9:14:18 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

i've already posted on this. see this thread for what you can do to help http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1262614/posts?page=5

number for the SD Att Gen is there and an e-mail link. let's overload his phone lines please


7 posted on 10/30/2004 9:14:39 AM PDT by sdpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Well then I guess that we will not count their votes huh!


8 posted on 10/30/2004 9:14:54 AM PDT by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Looks like the Dead will get to vote again!


9 posted on 10/30/2004 9:15:00 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

This is a US federal election, not a Sioux election. They need to appeal this to the federal courts immediately.


10 posted on 10/30/2004 9:15:07 AM PDT by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me; Congressman Billybob
So, the "official" democrat party response, through this supposed "independent group's leader" is that the repubbies are supposed to make specific claims of wrong-doing, and, without those specific claims, there was no illegal activity.

And, just to make sure there are no claims, the democrats get a hand-picked (tribal judge?) democrat to write a disjointed, poorly-written, over-broad restriction order AGAINST ANYBODY (anybody who is not from a democrat party lawyer that is!) from observing the polling place (NOT "private property"!) so they can OBSERVE (potential) illegal action so they can to make a statement claiming illegal activities to allow them to substantiate their claim.

But the claim of illegal activity by the democrats (according to the democrats' spokesman!) MUST be made without having video to capture evidence.
11 posted on 10/30/2004 9:15:25 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

This clown only has this authority if he involks his "independant nation" status.

If that status holds, then participation in "our" election is forsaken.


12 posted on 10/30/2004 9:15:46 AM PDT by G Larry (Support John Thune!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

A good place for FEDERAL election monitors.


13 posted on 10/30/2004 9:21:56 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunkhead_01
This is a US federal election, not a Sioux election.

Exactly, either they can abide by FEDERAL election rules, or the polling place must be closed; and the indians can vote on state soil, where the laws are observed.

14 posted on 10/30/2004 9:25:38 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

A "tribal judge" decides who can monitor the polls in a FEDERAL election? Will an Iman in Dearborn decree that sharia denies women the vote in this election?


15 posted on 10/30/2004 9:28:28 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

If the Indians are in their own country they shouldn't be voting in U.S. elections.


16 posted on 10/30/2004 9:42:54 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Then the indians are going to have to go to an off reservation polling place if they wish to participate in federal elections. If the polls can not be observed, then it's safe to say they can not be judged to be fair.


17 posted on 10/30/2004 9:47:45 AM PDT by McGavin999 (We have planted the seeds of democracy and watered them with our blood, now let freedom reign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Oh wait, I have an idea. If there can not be republican poll watchers there, perhaps federal marshalls can fill the void.


18 posted on 10/30/2004 9:48:38 AM PDT by McGavin999 (We have planted the seeds of democracy and watered them with our blood, now let freedom reign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

But if they allow poll watchers, then they couldn't vote as often as they like. People can vote as many times as they like in Chicago and St. Louis, why not the reservations? Doesn't sound fair.


19 posted on 10/30/2004 9:50:16 AM PDT by Blast_Master
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pardon Me

Question: Can anyone explain to me why these f*ck*rs vote democrat?


20 posted on 10/30/2004 10:12:34 AM PDT by SaintDismas (Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson