Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rebelbase

Not "dishonorable." It's "Other than Honorable." Big difference. Not that it should matter, but that may be one of their talking points if this pans out.


45 posted on 10/29/2004 11:00:00 AM PDT by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: brewcrew

Couldn't they just report that Kerry did NOT receive an honorable disharge?


76 posted on 10/29/2004 11:04:12 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brewcrew
Not "dishonorable." It's "Other than Honorable." Big difference. Not that it should matter, but that may be one of their talking points if this pans out.

Yes. Huge difference. (1) A DD can only be granted after a criminal conviction (i.e., General Court-Martial); (2) a discharge under other than honorable conditions (a.k.a. UOTHC, UO, or OTH) is granted in an administrative discharge proceeding; and (3) even in the wake of a conviction by court-martial, an officer cannot get a DD, only a "dismissal."

If in fact this turns out to be true (and I will believe it when I see it), we need to make sure we have our facts straight. Let sloppiness be the hallmark of CBS, not Freep.

151 posted on 10/29/2004 11:15:15 AM PDT by CaptainVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brewcrew
You're right about what kind of discharge he had--it might have been a Section 8. Fitting.
332 posted on 10/29/2004 11:48:39 AM PDT by GOPologist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson