Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How the heck did the truth sneak its way on to the Red Star's editorial page?
1 posted on 10/29/2004 10:23:57 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
. But I have a question for John Kerry -- what have you been doing for the last 20 years?

Holey Mackrel! How did the Star and Sickle editors let this through?

2 posted on 10/29/2004 10:26:46 AM PDT by akorahil (MSM is RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

The rats are deserting the sinking Swift Boat "Kerry".


3 posted on 10/29/2004 10:27:05 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort (Let the big Dawg EAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Interesting. From that paper it's almost unbelieveable.


4 posted on 10/29/2004 10:28:10 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Their candidate uses rock stars to attract crowds. Ours IS a rock star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Author Tom Junod captures this sentiment in an Esquire magazine article from August of this year.

Junod writes, "the reason Bush will be difficult to unseat in November is that his opponents operate out of the moral certainty that he is the bad guy and needs to be replaced, while Bush operates out of the moral certainty that the terrorists are the bad guys and need to be defeated."

There are clear differences in this election. These differences clearly favor George W. Bush.

There you have it in a nutshell, Sorry globalists and american haters... reality is, you chose a piss poor candidate with a piss poor motivation. Talking down america, being pessimistic and doom and gloom will never sway Americans.

Trying to portray GW Bush as the bad guy shows exactly where you stand.... out in left field and America will never join you there.

5 posted on 10/29/2004 10:32:34 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
More truth from Stenglein:

Contrast Kerry's record against George W. Bush's.

Bush campaigned in 2000 on lowering taxes for working families. He brought forward an idea, worked with Democrats and Republicans, and increased the per child tax credit to $1,000.

Bush campaigned in 2000 on reforming education in America. He brought forward an idea, worked with Democrats and Republicans and signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act.

Bush campaigned in 2000 on providing a prescription drug benefit plan for America's seniors. He brought forward an idea, worked with Democrats and Republicans, and signed the Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act.

While Kerry plans, Bush delivers.

Three, St. Paul Mayor Randy Kelly was onto something when he endorsed Bush earlier this year. Mayor Kelly rightly noted the extreme political hatred in opposition to George W. Bush.

Of those people who say they're supporting Kerry, more seem to be voting against Bush than for Kerry. That's too bad, but it says quite a bit about John Kerry.

8 posted on 10/29/2004 4:12:16 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson