Posted on 10/29/2004 10:05:16 AM PDT by Tolik
Two former MTV producers have accomplished what the entire mainstream media thus far has not: theyve captured the real life and times of the Iraqi people.
They didnt do it alone, however. Producers Eric Manes and Martin Kunert sent 150 digital cameras into Iraq this April with very simple instructions: Videotape your neighborhood, shopping area, where you live and work, pray, relax, and play and interview people who have the most meaning in your life. (See the entire instructions here.)
The cameras were passed on to friends and family members, and the handheld devices eventually made their way to the Shia south and later to the Kurdish north. Thousands of Iraqis turned in over 450 hours of footage, and the results surprised even Manes and Kunert.
The finished product, Voices of Iraq, is a taut 75-minute documentary, opening today in limited release in ten cities. (For listings, click here.) Infused throughout with an Iraqi hip-hop soundtrack, the briskly edited film is hands-off in letting ordinary Iraqis drive the storyline. That it wont realistically have much of an impact on the election is the only disappointing thing about this film.
Groundbreaking and instantly compelling, VOI is sort of the anti-Michael Moore film. Theres no narration, no heavy-handed editing. And whereas the man from Flint started with his premise and assembled his film to support it, the only goal when making VOI was to emulate the producers trailblazing MTV show Fear, which gave cameras to everyday youths who filmed themselves at supposedly haunted locations. Defying expectations, the show was a hit.
Not knowing what to expect, the producers partnered with actor and Gulf War veteran Archie Drury, who personally distributed cameras in Iraq this April. When they started getting back initial footage not long after, the situation was less than ideal, yet nowhere near as bleak as the media portrayed.
Life in Iraq is normal. Maybe not normal by American or European standards, but certainly for a country barely out from under the thumb of a bloodthirsty tyrant.
Throughout VOI, kids are seen being kids: laughing, playing, teasing, roughhousing. Iraqis are seen being silly: an adolescent boy doing what could only be described as a strange solo dance, an actor who filmed himself taking a shower, and policemen making bizarre sound effects and goofy faces. And boys being boys: young men returning to college last month hitting on pretty girls with lame come ons, such as The most beautiful girl, come here and Come here, I just want to talk to you.
Interspersed with that were painful reminders of Iraqs all-too-recent savage history, including former victims of Saddams torture having a conversation over dinner and video of Shia in the south recovering skeletal remains from mass graves. Though a few longed for the stability and security of Saddams regime, no one seen in VOI was under any delusions about the despot.
During Saddams pretrial hearing, Iraqis were shooting in celebration, and one man talked about how he danced when he heard the news of the tyrants capture.
Iraqis elation at Saddams demise should not come as a surprise. The most chilling moments of the film were four brief clips from official Fedayeen (Saddams paramilitary) videotape footage: a blindfolded and handcuffed man thrown from the top of a building, falling to his death; a boys hand being chopped off; two blindfolded young men, boys really, sitting on a bomb as it detonates; and a beheading.
Lasting no more than 15 seconds and completely silent, those images will haunt even the most jaded for days.
This side of evil, the real enemy of VOI is the mainstream media. Armed with footage that somehow eluded the multimillion-dollar big news operations, the $500,000 film occasionally throws up newspaper headlinesonly to show how woefully wrong they were.
From the movie:
Iraqis are nobodys fools. They are far savvier and more sophisticated than most would realize, particularly the paternalistic, peacenik left, which thought Iraqis were better off under Saddam. VOI has ordinary Iraqis talking about Saddams commonly-known harboring of al Qaeda operatives and how foreign governments dont want Iraqs democracy to succeed and are thus helping funnel terrorists into the country.
The Iraqi people understand democracy, but more important, they want democracy. Who knows exactly what form or shape their eventual government will take, but if the ordinary folks featured in VOI have any say, it will be a free society. Throughout, Iraqis define freedom as having a secular government, freedom of speech, or the freedom to partake in technological pleasures like the Internet and cell phones.
For those who read the above and want to label the project a partisan hack job without ever seeing it, many in VOIs team are Democrats. (What else would you expect from Hollywood types?) And there are several scenes where Iraqis express diametrically opposing views.
That politics was being openly discussedon camera, no lessis perhaps the greatest indicator of how much times have changed.
One extended scene showed nuanced political disagreements within one family, spats not that unlike what one would find inside a typical American household. The clans pre-teen son, Hasooni, bright and smiling, lacked any confusion or inner conflict, though.
When asked what he wants to be in the future, Hasooni exclaims, American.
Joel Mowbray (mail@joelmowbray.com) is author of Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Threatens Americas Security.
This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of good stuff that is worthy attention. I keep separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson, Lee Harris, David Warren, Orson Scott Card. You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about).
Yes, it's a frightening time for them right now...hard for the unemployed or under-employed former professionals, for the widows and orphans and the struggling families who have lost their homes and livelihood. But the film looks like yet another proof that the human spirit is indomitable and rises to these kinds of challenges. While I disagree with some of the religious beliefs in this region and the resulting destructive behavior that brought war back to their doorsteps, I see beauty in the lives and faces of these ordinary people and I have hopes that this first taste of freedom will inspire the kind of changes that can turn their homeland around for the better.
bump
Bump
Bump
bttt
Why such a limited release?
bump
NETFLIX HAS IT. JUST GOT "MY" COPY YESTERDAY.
I hope anyone who sees this movie will give us a review!
Bump
I watched Voices of Iraq a couple of days ago on DVD and I wanted to find out what people thought of it so a Google search led me to this site.
Joel has a nice write-up and my first comment is on the graphic nature of a small amount of the movie. As Joel notes, the graphic images stick with you for a while. The man whose tongue is pulled out and then clipped off was particularly disturbing as was the young man whose hand was surgically removed. So, my first point is to warn potential viewers about the graphic nature of this movie; I'd give it an X rating for those clips.
I haven't read this elsewhere, but it seems to me that a drawback of this kind of filmmaking approach is that it's going to capture mostly people having normal lives. I'm trying to think, what if some filmmakers in say, Egypt, did this project in the U.S. after 9/11/01. Relatively speaking, very very few people were directly and adversely impacted by the terrorist attacks. Life went on, people went about their normal activities, and we were encouraged to do so by our government, also. So it is valuable to keep in perspective that if the war and occupation killed 100,000 or even 200,000 Iraqis, that the remaining millions are still alive and going about their daily existence and are happy to see their dictator gone (unless maybe they're Sunnis) and are mostly concerned about security and gasoline and electricity and food.
The film doesn't state anything about the primary justification for the war (pre-emptive self-defense based on threats of WMD) or the costs or what the alternatives were. The film also doesn't state anything about past American support for Saddam and whether or not that was a good idea. I'm curious what most Iraqis think about these questions. From this movie alone you would conclude that it doesn't matter, that getting rid of Saddam made it all worthwhile.
To stand on a soapbox, I'll say that as a human being, I'm glad that this tyrant Saddam has been removed but as an American taxpayer, I'm disappointed that the primary justification was false and that the war did not pay for itself as predicted and that no one was held accountable for these failures.
read later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.