ZOT! Freerepublic Is The Most Cowardly, Unfree Site In The Universe!

I myself, Freepers! | georgerichard

[Not A Snowbird]

twit.

Your eloquence is humbling, CG.

:-)

[Arrowhead1952]

Bagged another troll for the day.

[Conspiracy Guy]

I slapped him silly under his other name a day or so ago. Twit just fits.

[codyjacksmom]

Go tell it to someone that actually cares...idiot.

[Twinkie]

I think there are some few trolls who have managed to
stay on; some posts and replies have a subtle stink of
leftist about them as one cruises the board.

[mlocher]

But I will encourage friends to get in here and have a rich, good belly-laugh about those cherished 'values' that you'd like to radiate

good...you might serve a useful purpose afterall. some of your friends might actually see truth and drop their vile liberalism.

bye bye. don't worry about us, there are still other misguided souls like you around.

[afnamvet]

"YOU want a piece of me Troll? Cmon in here and I'll tear your face off!"

[moonman]

^5's Good job!:)

[MarineBrat]

I had a strong reaction to your post!

[FourtySeven]

For the record, I found the article he's talking about. Let's take a look at some key points in it:

The Lancet admits the research is based on a small sample - under 1,000 homes - but says the findings are "convincing".

UK foreign secretary Jack Straw said his government would examine the findings "with very great care".

But he told BBC's Today that another independent estimate of civilian deaths was around 15,000. The Iraq Body Count, a respected database run by a group of academics and peace activists, has put the number of reported civilian deaths at between 14,000-16,000.

Iraq Body Count: 14-16,000
Brookings Inst: 10-27,000
UK foreign secretary: >10,000
People's Kifah >37,000
Lancet (this study): >100,000

Key points to derive here: 1. The study was based on a small sample size, which if you ask anyone in science, is a key indicator right there of faulty methodology. 2. Other "respected, peace activist" organizations say it's about ten times LESS than this study. Why would PEACE activists make their figures less than actual?!? 3. Based on the figure above, one can see this study in question is ISOLATED, yet another indicator of internal bias (i.e, political motivations, intended to embarass the UK and the US).

george, given the figure above, showing this Lancet study to be ISOLATED in its findings, don't you think the BBC is just a TAD bit biased in titling the article, "Iraq death toll 'soared post-war'"? Actually, I guess we should all thank you for providing yet again, another example of liberal bias at the BBC.

At any rate, like others have said george, don't go away mad, just go away. Thanks for playing.

source

[Ignatz]

I can see that you've typed something, but all I can read is "blah blah blah".

[Lady Jag]

GR, you're a fool.

[ABG(anybody but Gore)]

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. Don't you know that you are pathetic? You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas, I'll bet you couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you.

You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you. You are a bloody nardless newbie twit protohominid chromosomally aberrant caricature of a coprophagic cloacal parasitic pond scum and I wish you would go away.

You're a putrescence mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.

You are a bleating fool, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?

If you aren't an idiot, you made a world-class effort at simulating one. Try to edit your writing of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot.

And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meatslapper.

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh.

The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn't really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.

P.S.: You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally Not Good.

I Hope This Helps...

[mlocher]

LOL

[mlocher]

Because thanks to liberalism and political correctness, hardly any "science" these days is independent.

your point is well taken, but this idiot won't get it.

[baseballfanjm]

[PhilipFreneau]

>> My thread got pulled after 2 replies.

Duh. The title of this site is "Free Republic", not "Free Communist". Get a clue, dunce.

[jellybean]

Some selected quotes from georgerichards's performance evaluation:

• "I would not allow georgerichard to breed."
• "Georgerichard is really not so much of a has-been, but more of a definite won't be."
• "Works well when under constant supervision and cornered like a rat in a trap."
• "When he opens his mouth, it seems that it is only to change feet."
• "This young man has delusions of adequacy."
• "He sets low personal standards and then consistently fails to achieve them."
• "This poster is depriving a village somewhere of an idiot."
• "This poster should go far, and the sooner he starts, the Better."
• "Got a full 6-pack, but lacks the plastic thingy to hold it all together."
• "A gross ignoramus -- 144 times worse than an ordinary ignoramus."
• "He doesn't have ulcers, but he's a carrier."
• "He brings a lot of joy whenever he leaves the room."
• "When his IQ reaches 50, he should sell."
• "If you see two people talking and one looks bored, he's the other one."
• "A photographic memory but with the lens cover glued on."
• "A prime candidate for natural de-selection."
• "Donated his brain to science before he was done using it."
• "Gates are down, the lights are flashing, but the train isn't coming."
• "He's got two brains cells, one is lost and the other is out looking for it."
• "If he were any more stupid, he'd have to be watered twice a week."
• "If you give him a penny for his thoughts, you'd get change."
• "If you stand close enough to him, you can hear the ocean."
• "It's hard to believe he beat out 1,000,000 other sperm."
• "One neuron short of a synapse."
• "Some drink from the fountain of knowledge; he only gargled."
• "Takes him 2 hours to watch '60-minutes'."
• "The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead"

[Hardastarboard]

Yeah, I remember the JAMA article about gun control a few years ago. That is supposedly a respected scientific journal also. As I recall, they compared gun control in Vancouver with gun control in Seattle, and found, surprise, that gun control led to less crime. Turns out they sort of, um, forgot to control for a real significant difference in the research - the difference in minority population in the respective cities. Controlling for that of course made the difference go away, but somehow they missed that. Certainly doesn't do much for the reputation of a good "science" magazine, now does it?

[wjcsux]

Go back to DU troll!