Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP: TV Video May Show Missing Explosives
AP ^ | 10/29

Posted on 10/29/2004 2:03:51 AM PDT by ambrose

Posted on Fri, Oct. 29, 2004

TV Video May Show Missing Explosives

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Videotape shot by a Minnesota television crew traveling with U.S. troops in Iraq when they first opened the bunkers at the Al-Qaqaa munitions base nine days after the fall of Saddam Hussein shows what appeared to be high explosives still in barrels and bearing the markings of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The video taken by KSTP of St. Paul on April 18, 2003, could reinforce suggestions that tons of explosives missing from a munitions installation in Iraq were looted after the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. The video was broadcast nationally Thursday on ABC.

"The photographs are consistent with what I know of Al-Qaqaa," David A. Kay, a former American official who directed the hunt in Iraq for unconventional weapons and visited the site, told The New York Times. "The damning thing is the seals. The Iraqis didn't use seals on anything. So I'm absolutely sure that's an IAEA seal."

The question of what happened to the tons of explosives has become a major issue in the closing days of the presidential campaign.

Democrat John Kerry says the missing explosives - powerful enough to demolish a building, bring down a jetliner or set off a nuclear weapon - are another example of the Bush administration's poor planning and incompetence in handling the war in Iraq. President Bush says the explosives were possibly removed by Saddam's forces before the invasion.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld entered the debate Thursday, suggesting the 377 tons of explosives were taken away before U.S. forces arrived, saying any large effort to loot the material afterward would have been detected.

"We would have seen anything like that," he said in one of two radio interviews he gave at the Pentagon. "The idea it was suddenly looted and moved out, all of these tons of equipment, I think is at least debatable."

The Pentagon also declassified and released a single image, taken by reconnaissance aircraft or satellite just days before the war, showing two trucks outside one of the dozens of storage bunkers at the Al-Qaqaa munitions base.

The particular bunker is not one known to have contained any of the missing explosives, and Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said the image only shows that there was some Iraqi activity at the base when it was taken, on March 17. Di Rita said the image says nothing about what happened to the explosives.

Rumsfeld, in one radio interview, also cast doubt on the suggestion of one of his subordinates that Russian forces assisted the Iraqis in removing them.

John Shaw, the deputy U.S. undersecretary of defense for international technology security, suggested to The Washington Times in an interview that the Russians may have been involved, prompting an angry denial from Moscow.

Rumsfeld said, "I have no information on that at all, and cannot validate that even slightly."

But at issue is whether the weapons were moved before or after U.S. forces occupied that region of the country in early April. No one has been able to provide conclusive evidence either way, although Iraqi officials blamed it on poor U.S. security after Baghdad fell.

The Pentagon has said it's looking into the matter, and officials note that 400,000 tons of recovered Iraqi munitions have either been destroyed or are slated to be destroyed.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqaqaa; ammogate; iraq; missingexplosives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: endthematrix

The 138 tonnes of RDX is confirmed to have been moved before the American Military arrived at Al Qa Qaa...

Mohamed El Baradei lied in his letter to the UN when he stated that there were 380 tonnes of HE at Al Qa Qaa

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/alqaqaa_documents.pdf


21 posted on 10/29/2004 3:14:11 AM PDT by TruthCanHurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jess35

unsubstantiated rumour is now the news...
At least according to CBS, NY Times, and ABC's 2 videos (Explosives and terrorist video).


22 posted on 10/29/2004 3:15:29 AM PDT by TruthCanHurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
All true. But most people are getting at least some of their news from the internet these days.

In other words, Kerry's still screwed :)

23 posted on 10/29/2004 3:17:49 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

The Democrats and their media accomplices are wasting their ammo. The war is over. Bush is surging.


24 posted on 10/29/2004 4:10:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat
1. KERRY and NYT CLAIMS 380 TONS WERE MISSING

2. IAEA ADMITS ONLY 3 TONS LEFT

Well, maybe it was a bookkeeping error

380 tons was actually 3.80 tons.

Somebody forgot the decimal point.

25 posted on 10/29/2004 4:13:43 AM PDT by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Well, give the left credit for at least talking about the war, and not a woman's right to "choose."


26 posted on 10/29/2004 4:15:07 AM PDT by Huck ("Winners don't need to hijack airplanes. Winners have an air force." --P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
"IAEA ADMITS THE BUNKERS WERE NOT CHECKED

This too, please."

FOX reported this morning that in the IAEA report it was noted that there was access to the bunkers through vent shafts and that their seals could not prevent entry.

27 posted on 10/29/2004 4:16:26 AM PDT by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: airborne; Grampa Dave; seenenuf
Guess this Foxnews item ties to this thread:

News Video Might Show Missing Explosives

The other thread was pulled, not sure exactly why.

28 posted on 10/29/2004 8:41:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

Thanks! I've been looking for that.


29 posted on 10/29/2004 8:50:04 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TruthCanHurt

Thanks!


30 posted on 10/29/2004 9:08:32 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: airborne
It would have been an unlikely error during mathematical conversion since the amounts were in Kilograms.
31 posted on 10/29/2004 9:11:43 PM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

What is the skinny on this story about the Minn newscrew filming the "380 tons of explosives" is this verified?. Will it hurt Bush? Inquiring minds want to know.


32 posted on 10/30/2004 12:29:22 AM PDT by DaiHuy (en vertias est lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

Read the previous posts. The claim is bogus. It has been grossly overestemated and the more Kerry wan'ts to make it an issue he exposes the reasons WHY we wnet into Iraq in the first place. The stuff has moved before the US was there.


33 posted on 10/30/2004 12:35:30 AM PDT by endthematrix (10 out of 10 terrorists agree-Anybody but Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

what kind of a stupid "seal" is that?


34 posted on 10/30/2004 12:44:56 AM PDT by The Red Zone (The reason they're trying to starve her isn't because she's dying, but because she isn't. [Supercat])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

I guess I should have added (sarcasm). My bad.


35 posted on 10/30/2004 5:37:41 AM PDT by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson