The "context" of your quote is from #198. Anyone can go read it, and then read what I said about it at #230. Feel free to provide any additional context to your statement that you think is somehow necessary.
But if you fail to address it at all, then it'll be clear who's fleeing the field, and it won't be me.
I considered your claim arcane, nitpicking & pointless.
You think its such a great point, rephrase the argument in more detail [quoting mine in context] & I'll address it in kind.