I considered your claim arcane, nitpicking & pointless.
You think its such a great point, rephrase the argument in more detail [quoting mine in context] & I'll address it in kind.
But not incorrect, interestingly enough. And since you agreed to address it, it can't be that pointless.
You think its such a great point, rephrase the argument in more detail [quoting mine in context] & I'll address it in kind.
I'm not going to try to read your mind. It's up to you to request the specific detail that you think is missing from #230, and to provide the context to your statement that you think is necessary. But of course, you're not going to do that, because all you're really doing is looking for excuses to stall.
I responded again because you made like you were finally going to address the statement. But if you don't, then as before, you can babble to yourself, since you'll have effectively abandoned the argument.