Some will read the first paragraph and say “Bible thumper” and dismiss all that follows.
Why is it that the truth of how repulsive partial birth abortions are, the description of the process already taboo and immediately labels one as a weirdo?
What does the author say that is wrong? Where is a factual inaccuracy?
So while many modern people worship their fake gods and “systems” they overlook the atrocities committed in our back yard. It’s for the “greater good” is the rationalization. We must exterminate all the Jews for the greater good of mankind just like today we eradicate VIABLE life for the greater “economic good” or “personal freedom” of the mother. The rest involved do it for the money. It's a business.
We will over look the spreading of AIDS, Hepatitis and other minor diseases among homosexuals just as we will over look the details of partial birth abortions. In fact if you state that homosexuality may be wrong, it is YOU who is the culprit. YOU are the homophobic NAZI that is morally wrong!
This writer is 100% on target. But he will not be picked up by the MSM. America has already become too “intellectual” and “sees the bigger picture/good”. We have become numb, and conditioned to associate his opening thoughts with “radical religious idiot”, even though it’s all true.
Kerry went to church before the elections. So did Clinton! What is this writer talking about? They have morals and believe in God and let these values guid there decision making. Sarcasm off.
Red6
The writer just popped in on post #38.
As usual, Jesus turns our "logic" on its head. In Christ's economy, the needs of the one outweigh the needs of the ninety and nine. The good shepherd leaves the 99---not in the fold or a place of safety, but "in the wilderness", a place of risk and danger and [HORRORS!!!] L I A B I L I T Y!!!!---to seek the one lost lamb. And he seeks it "TILL he findeth it".
Time we all remember the "big picture" is made up of many individual pixels and get back to being personal salt and light.