To: handy
I'm not sure I believe this
To: neutrality
I'm not sure I believe this It is pretty unbelievable, but it's on his website.
16 posted on
10/28/2004 1:50:31 PM PDT by
handy
(Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
To: neutrality
I'm not sure I believe this I'm doubtful, as well. I mean, if they did hold it back, who in the world would have the nerve to tell? This is nuts.
18 posted on
10/28/2004 1:50:45 PM PDT by
SheLion
(PLEASE vote! We can't afford to be silent!!!! Do we really want FnKerry to run our Country?!)
To: neutrality
Yeah, well I wouldn't have believed that CBS would use obviously phony documents in an attempt to smear a sitting president during an election campaign. Up is down these days.
To: neutrality
I would have said it was probable, up until the mentions of Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. That to me was a dead give-away that this is some sort of lame Democrat plant. Couple that with the "don't vote for Bush" message, and that confirms it.
Honestly, with the hatred that Al Queda feels for the United States, do you really think it matters to them who is President, in terms of their launching an offensive on the U.S.? No. The only difference this election has on them is whether we will have a President that takes the fight to them, or a pretender-resident who would STILL be scoring his freakin' global test.
563 posted on
10/28/2004 4:00:34 PM PDT by
cincinnati65
(Just up the road a piece.......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson