TERROR TAPE WARN OF BUSH, CHENEY CONSEQUENCE; ABC WITHHELD PORTIONS FROM CIA

Drudge ^ | 10-28-04 | Drudge

[Nathan Zachary]

savage is playing tape now.

[Grampa Dave]

Actually, I want to drive the thorns in really deep. It is time for them to bleed and really suffer. The beginning will be when we Mondale their buddy Kerry this Tuesday.

Then we can turn our attention on them.

[cincinnati65]

I would have said it was probable, up until the mentions of Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. That to me was a dead give-away that this is some sort of lame Democrat plant. Couple that with the "don't vote for Bush" message, and that confirms it.

Honestly, with the hatred that Al Queda feels for the United States, do you really think it matters to them who is President, in terms of their launching an offensive on the U.S.? No. The only difference this election has on them is whether we will have a President that takes the fight to them, or a pretender-resident who would STILL be scoring his freakin' global test.

[Nathan Zachary]

was... what he played was the 'terrorist' saying that what we will see will make us forget all about 911

[7mmMag@LeftCoast]

As much as I hate the content of your message, it resonates with truth.

The MSM is overwhelmingly leftist. They all have a vested interest in protecting each other. The people who write, edit and report the news could give a damn less about fiduciary responsibility to share holders.

Their's is an ideological war they wage and they believe they are right and that they are owed the pedestal that the corporations (shareholders) whom own the MSM afford them.

Do not believe for a second that they will go after each other to gain market share. That is only the viewpoint of a few of the company bean counters, not the Halperins, Rathers and Koppels of their twisted world.

And those that say they are there to report the news are very naive. For the leftist ideologue it is ALL about making and being the news, in order to advance their socialist viewpoint.

[SheLion]

They must be scared stiff that W is going to be re-elected and their next wake-up call will be via MOAB

Well, if the idiots attack us between now and January, it's a no-win situation for them. A President can not be removed from office during war time. And we would surely be at war.

But I would much rather have a land slide at the polls!!!

What was that President's name? We went to war and he was secured as President during that whole time. Was it Truman or Rosevelt?

[Dog Gone]

It's not even the top story of the show. They played maybe 30 seconds of it, and Jennings had very little editorial comment. It was very underplayed.

[Nightshift]

because if there is anything on that tape that can lead to the terrorist and stop them before they strike and would save lives and ABC withheld this from the government, then they are as guilty as the actual terrorists.

[SheLion]

We haven't heard a thing from OSAMA lately...

I know it. He is letting the RATS do his work. LOL!

I am just shaking my head here. Got to laugh to keep from crying.

[Dog Gone]

The only weird thing about what this white guy said was when he pronounced "tyranny". He pronounced it Tie-run-nee.

[Henchman]

"What took place on September 11 was but the opening salvo of the global war on America and...." BS, Clinton FAILED to deal with the 1993 issue of the WTC, the Cole, embassies etc etc.

[Grampa Dave]

"The MSM is overwhelmingly leftist. They all have a vested interest in protecting each other. The people who write, edit and report the news could give a damn less about fiduciary responsibility to share holders."

The part where they care less about the stock holders will become one of our weapons after this election.

"Their's is an ideological war they wage and they believe they are right and that they are owed the pedestal that the corporations (shareholders) whom own the MSM afford them."

After we get the SEC after their boards and CEOs, the huge congolmerates which own ABCNNBCBS and their NOTNEWS departments will decide it isn't worth the hassle and cost to have these NOTNEWS divisions.

[Henchman]

He is from "DEETROIT" and hence the mispronouncement

[Eastbound]

"Just saw the ABC story by Jennings. At a minimum, ABC had better post the entire transcript of the tape tonight.

I mentioned a little earlier that there is a possibility that the tape is phoney and ABC knows it is, but wanted to publicize it anyway without actually running it. Why would it be phoney? Only one reason that I can think of at the moment. The DNC had it made as an ace in the hole for times like these when they are tanking to blackmail the country into voting democrat else face rivers of blood by terrorists if Bush wins.

[tsmith130]

Yeah, I caught that too.

[Armedanddangerous]

"only weird thing about what this white guy said was when he pronounced "tyranny". He pronounced it Tie-run-nee."

I caught that myself...

Maybe he was just a moron?

[SheLion]

It's not even the top story of the show. They played maybe 30 seconds of it, and Jennings had very little editorial comment. It was very underplayed.

My thoughts exactly. There wasn't much of a big deal made about it, was there!

[DocRock]

I was in a hurry and I know I miss typed in my photo. I'll fix it in a minute...

If you have a high speed connection, CLICK HERE to watch 2.7 Mb .wmv Video

[Nathan Zachary]

We are being destablized by insects with headscarves, LOL!

[James Coburn]

I noticed that you had nothing to say about the subject of my post. The bullet points I listed are factually correct. You wrote these things. You have been raising the hopes of Freepers for awhile now, and nothing has materialized.

I used this current thread because you brought up the subject of "tin foil". Creating a separate thread for a rant (even thought I feel the rant is justified) is against this board's policies.

I am not the only one on this board who has noticed your posts regarding a Bush surprise. I have seen others ask you directly "...is this it?....is this it?" only to have you respond with "No Comment;)" or something else indicating that "it" was coming. Very coy remarks indeed.

This election season is hard enough on everybody without having some person pretending to be "connected" giving out false information. It is very disappointing when the promised event does not occur.

I can't speak for everyone on this board, but I think most would agree that what they want is honest observation and truthful information; not name dropping and "tin foil" prognostications.

I apologize to others on this board for this complaint. I just feel that this is something that needed to be said.