Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Active Sun in 8,000 Years
Max Planck Society News Release

Posted on 10/28/2004 12:37:55 PM PDT by ckilmer

Most Active Sun in 8,000 Years

Summary - (Oct 28, 2004) The Sun is more active today than it has been in 8,000 years, according to new research from the Max Planck Institute. Researchers discovered that a certain isotope of carbon, C-14, depends on the amount of cosmic rays that reach the Earth's surface. When solar activity is high, the Sun's magnetic field provides a shield against these cosmic rays, and when it's low, the Sun lets more cosmic rays reach the Earth. By measuring C-14 levels in dead trees which were buried in the ground, the scientists were able to build up a historic record of solar activity. Scientists have found that solar activity levels only slightly influence the Earth's climate and global temperature.

Full Story - The activity of the Sun over the last 11,400 years, i.e., back to the end of the last ice age on Earth, has now for the first time been reconstructed quantitatively by an international group of researchers led by Sami K. Solanki from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany). The scientists have analyzed the radioactive isotopes in trees that lived thousands of years ago. As the scientists from Germany, Finland, and Switzerland report in the current issue of the science journal "Nature" from October 28, one needs to go back over 8,000 years in order to find a time when the Sun was, on average, as active as in the last 60 years. Based on a statistical study of earlier periods of increased solar activity, the researchers predict that the current level of high solar activity will probably continue only for a few more decades.

The research team had already in 2003 found evidence that the Sun is more active now than in the previous 1000 years. A new data set has allowed them to extend the length of the studied period of time to 11,400 years, so that the whole length of time since the last ice age could be covered. This study showed that the current episode of high solar activity since about the year 1940 is unique within the last 8000 years. This means that the Sun has produced more sunspots, but also more flares and eruptions, which eject huge gas clouds into space, than in the past. The origin and energy source of all these phenomena is the Sun's magnetic field.

Since the invention of the telescope in the early 17th century, astronomers have observed sunspots on a regular basis. These are regions on the solar surface where the energy supply from the solar interior is reduced owing to the strong magnetic fields that they harbour. As a consequence, sunspots are cooler by about 1,500 degrees and appear dark in comparison to their non-magnetic surroundings at an average temperature of 5,800 degrees. The number of sunspots visible on the solar surface varies with the 11-year activity cycle of the Sun, which is modulated by long-term variations. For example, there were almost no sunspots seen during the second half of the 17th century.

For many studies concerning the origin of solar activity and its potential effect on long-term variations of Earth's climate, the interval of time since the year 1610, for which systematic records of sunspots exist, is much too short. For earlier times the level of solar activity must be derived from other data. Such information is stored on Earth in the form of "cosmogenic" isotopes. These are radioactive nuclei resulting from collisions of energetic cosmic ray particles with air molecules in the upper atmosphere. One of these isotopes is C-14, radioactive carbon with a half life of 5730 years, which is well known from the C-14 method to determine the age of wooden objects. The amount of C-14 produced depends strongly on the number of cosmic ray particles that reach the atmosphere. This number, in turn, varies with the level of solar activity: during times of high activity, the solar magnetic field provides an effective shield against these energetic particles, while the intensity of the cosmic rays increases when the activity is low. Therefore, higher solar activity leads to a lower production rate of C-14, and vice versa.

By mixing processes in the atmosphere, the C-14 produced by cosmic rays reaches the biosphere and part of it is incorporated in the biomass of trees. Some tree trunks can be recovered from below the ground thousands of years after their death and the content of C-14 stored in their tree rings can be measured. The year in which the C-14 had been incorporated is determined by comparing different trees with overlapping life spans. In this way, one can measure the production rate of C-14 backward in time over 11,400 years, right to the end of the last ice age. The research group have used these data to calculate the variation of the number of sunspots over these 11,400 years. The number of sunspots is a good measure also for the strength of the various other phenomena of solar activity.

The method of reconstructing solar activity in the past, which describes each link in the complex chain connecting the isotope abundances with the sunspot number with consistent quantitative physical models, has been tested and gauged by comparing the historical record of directly measured sunspot numbers with earlier shorter reconstructions on the basis of the cosmogenic isotope Be-10 in the polar ice shields. The models concern the production of the isotopes by cosmic rays, the modulation of the cosmic ray flux by the interplanetary magnetic field (the open solar magnetic flux), as well as the relation between the large-scale solar magnetic field and the sunspot number. In this way, for the first time a quantitatively reliable reconstruction of the sunspot number for the whole time since the end of the last ice age could be obtained.

Because the brightness of the Sun varies slightly with solar activity, the new reconstruction indicates also that the Sun shines somewhat brighter today than in the 8,000 years before. Whether this effect could have provided a significant contribution to the global warming of the Earth during the last century is an open question. The researchers around Sami K. Solanki stress the fact that solar activity has remained on a roughly constant (high) level since about 1980 - apart from the variations due to the 11-year cycle - while the global temperature has experienced a strong further increase during that time. On the other hand, the rather similar trends of solar activity and terrestrial temperature during the last centuries (with the notable exception of the last 20 years) indicates that the relation between the Sun and climate remains a challenge for further research.

Original Source: Max Planck Society News Release


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Junior

As is done with the shroud of Turin.


41 posted on 10/29/2004 6:41:27 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PureSolace

Thanks for the pictures.


42 posted on 10/29/2004 6:43:03 AM PDT by bmwcyle (I wear sleepwear therefore I think (When they are off I am single minded))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Carbon 14 dating is based on C-14 imbedding being CONSTANT.

No.

43 posted on 10/29/2004 6:47:18 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Cafeteria Science.
44 posted on 10/29/2004 6:50:29 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Good source for dispelling C14 myths.


45 posted on 10/29/2004 7:04:54 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

"I'm the Sun King, baby..."


46 posted on 10/29/2004 7:06:25 AM PDT by TigerTale (What Iran really needs right now is $1.05.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
I'm so glad I can say I'm the first to say this -

"I'm suspicious of the timing"

47 posted on 10/29/2004 7:06:54 AM PDT by UsnDadof8 (Kerry is no sportsman...Unless lying could be considered a sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I was wondering how many of the usual group will latch onto this as proof positive that global warming is a hoax, but will then turn around in another thread and lambast C14 dating as unreliable.

What this article proves is that - contrary to the mindless sputterings of talking heads in the media - there is no consensus among scientists that global warming is caused by industrial release of greenhouse gases. You don't have to believe in carbon-14 dating in order to understand that.

48 posted on 10/29/2004 8:29:12 AM PDT by inquest (We have more people patrolling Bosnia's borders than we have patrolling our own borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Except that this study is based upon the amounts of C14 in deceased organic materials -- the same system used to date those materials.


49 posted on 10/29/2004 11:48:45 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Most Active Sun in 8,000 Years.

This may only be anecdotal evidence, and/or a statistical outlier, but up my way the Sun has been rising later and later every dang morning lately!

That's not what I call getting more active!

50 posted on 10/29/2004 11:52:34 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I understand that, but first of all, they're not actually using these measurements for the purpose of dating, but for the purpose of measuring the levels of sunspot activities in the past. Even if the 8,000-year figure isn't accurate, it still would show that this is the most active sun in a long time.

Secondly and more importantly, regardless of whether or not this technique is valid for any purpose at all, the scientists believe it to be valid, which disproves the notion that there's a consensus in the scientific community that global warming is human-induced.

51 posted on 10/29/2004 12:10:12 PM PDT by inquest (We have more people patrolling Bosnia's borders than we have patrolling our own borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: inquest

You still do not understand. These guys are using the same techniques to determine the extent of Solar activity that they use for dating finds. If one is valid, the other is, too.


52 posted on 10/29/2004 12:18:04 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Nope. They are using C14 level expected(tree ring count) vs Measured C14 level to back calculate original C14 levels.

Which explains the limited time frame of about 10K years as that is the scope of the tree ring calander.

BTW creationists explain away >6K years worth of tree rings and ice layers by postulating more rapid season changes in the past.

53 posted on 10/29/2004 12:20:02 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Junior
You read only half the post.
54 posted on 10/29/2004 12:21:24 PM PDT by inquest (We have more people patrolling Bosnia's borders than we have patrolling our own borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

John Kerry: "We need to build a global consensus to ensure that we do not unilaterally provoke any further eruptions from the sun's chromosphere to the point where UN nuclear inspectors would deduce it becoming a hazard environmentally to those we love and cherish among the global community, and any President that fails to address this issue is not fit to be Commander in Chief."

George Bush: "Hey, how about this great weather!"


55 posted on 10/29/2004 12:23:39 PM PDT by UncleSamUSA (the land of the free and the home of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
A killshot would be when a mega-solar flare fires and it happens to be aimed at the earth. It would be like a great solar tongue, many time larger than the one recorded on 05NOV03, reaching out and licking clean the side of the earth facing the sun.

Ed Dames, referenced by a later poster, is a remote viewer (whos views I do not ascribe to) that claims to be able to not just to see across space, but time. He claims a killshot is in our near future.

56 posted on 10/30/2004 10:42:48 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

WOW!!

That's a new one on me. Something else to worry about.


57 posted on 11/01/2004 5:42:59 AM PST by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Quick, get the billboards up!

"BUSH CAUSES INCREASED SUN SPOTS!"


58 posted on 11/01/2004 5:48:50 AM PST by maine-iac7 ( Pray without doubt..."Ask and you SHALL receive")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson