Posted on 10/27/2004 7:03:43 PM PDT by ambrose
MISSING EXPLOSIVES
4 Iraqis Tell of Looting at Munitions Site in '03
By JAMES GLANZ and JIM DWYER
Published: October 28, 2004
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Oct. 27 - Looters stormed the weapons site at Al Qaqaa in the days after American troops swept through the area in early April 2003 on their way to Baghdad, gutting office buildings, carrying off munitions and even dismantling heavy machinery, three Iraqi witnesses and a regional security chief said Wednesday.
Advertisement
The Iraqis described an orgy of theft so extensive that enterprising residents rented their trucks to looters. But some looting was clearly indiscriminate, with people grabbing anything they could find and later heaving unwanted items off the trucks.
Two witnesses were employees of Al Qaqaa - one a chemical engineer and the other a mechanic - and the third was a former employee, a chemist, who had come back to retrieve his records, determined to keep them out of American hands. The mechanic, Ahmed Saleh Mezher, said employees asked the Americans to protect the site but were told this was not the soldiers' responsibility.
The accounts do not directly address the question of when 380 tons of powerful conventional explosives vanished from the site sometime after early March, the last time international inspectors checked the seals on the bunkers where the material was stored. It is possible that Iraqi forces removed some explosives before the invasion.
But the accounts make clear that what set off much if not all of the looting was the arrival and swift departure of American troops, who did not secure the site after inducing the Iraqi forces to abandon it.
"The looting started after the collapse of the regime," said Wathiq al-Dulaimi, a regional security chief, who was based nearby in Latifiya. But once it had begun, he said, the booty streamed toward Baghdad.
Earlier this month, on Oct. 10, the directorate of national monitoring at the Ministry of Science and Technology notified the International Atomic Energy Agency that the explosives, which are used in demolition and missiles and are the raw material for plastic explosives, were missing. The agency has monitored the explosives because they can also be used as the initiator of an atomic bomb.
Agency officials examined the explosives in January 2003 and noted in early March that their seals were still in place. On April 3, the Third Infantry Division arrived with the first American troops.
Chris Anderson, a photographer for U.S. News and World Report who was with the division's Second Brigade, recalled that the area was jammed with American armor on April 3 and 4, which he believed made the removal of the explosives unlikely. "It would be quite improbable for this amount of weapons to be looted at that time because of the traffic jam of armor," he said.
The brigade blew up numerous caches of arms throughout the area, he said. Mr. Anderson said he did not enter the munitions compound.
The Second Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division arrived outside the site on April 10, under the command of Col. Joseph Anderson. The brigade had been ordered to move quickly to Baghdad because of civil disorder there after Mr. Hussein's government fell on April 9.
They gathered at Al Qaqaa, about 30 miles south, simply as a matter of convenience, Colonel Anderson said in an interview this week. He said that when he arrived at the site - unaware of its significance - he saw no signs of looting, but was not paying close attention.
Because he thought the brigade would be moving on to Baghdad within hours, Al Qaqaa was of no importance to his mission, he said, and he was unaware of the explosives that international inspectors said were hidden inside.
Pentagon officials said Wednesday that analysts were examining surveillance photographs of the munitions site. But they expressed doubts that the photographs, which showed vehicles at the location on several occasions early in the conflict, before American troops moved through the area, would be able to indicate conclusively when the explosives were removed.
Col. David Perkins, who commanded the Second Brigade of the Third Infantry Division, called it "very highly improbable" that 380 tons of explosives could have been trucked out of Al Qaqaa in the weeks after American troops arrived.
Moving that much material, said Colonel Perkins, who spoke Wednesday to news agencies and cable television, "would have required dozens of heavy trucks and equipment moving along the same roadways as U.S. combat divisions occupied continually for weeks."
He conceded that some looting of the site had taken place. But a chemical engineer who worked at Al Qaqaa and identified himself only as Khalid said that once troops left the base itself, people streamed in to steal computers and anything else of value from the offices. They also took munitions like artillery shells, he said.
Mr. Mezher, the mechanic, said it took the looters about two weeks to disassemble heavy machinery at the site and carry that off after the smaller items were gone.
James Glanz reported from Baghdad for this article and Jim Dwyer from New York. Ali Adeeb contributed reporting from Baghdad, and Khalid W. Hussein and Zainab Obeid fromAl Qaqaa.
The NYT is backing off the original story.
Hopefully this will kill Kerry and highlight how wasily he lies without regard to the facts.
It sounds more and more like the U.N. helped DELAY out getting over there. We should have been over there sooner so that this kind of stuff wouldn't "vanish". Kerry and the press are making Bushs case.
Call the DOD.
Lame response from NY Crimes. Just like Dan Rather's typewriter font experts after he was busted.
They are a disgrace to America, not just journalism. This has got to be one of the most dishonest, corrupt institutions in this entire country.
They need to suffer major,major repercussions for this. The leftist media is not going to develop any accountability at all while these scumbags continue to get away with more and more outrageous criminal activity like this. And I do believe this is morally criminal, whether or not they can be proven to have broken actual laws.
So, is this the equivalent of the NYT's giving the "Viet Cong" a forum?
I would question the allegiance of these "Iraqi's".
Boy can we say that they are getting desperate. I smell backfire.
A number of FReepers (and liberals) wanted GI's to die to defend those art and historical treasures.
Did you see the story in tomorrow's NYT?
NY Times: Iraqis Tell of Looting The Food King
Never buy a NYSLIMES...BUY THE POST! Thats how it works.
They are trying every shape to find one that will fit. Just like a kid. The media never, ever learns but being the most powerful newspaper in the world, they can and do get away with it. If you read the whole article,, basically what was looted was OFFICE SUPPLIES!!!!!!!!!!!!
In the meantime, Kerry keeps sliming the troops for not guarding the explosives, oh he says the president's name because he is running against the president, but it was the TROOPS that were over there -- not Bush!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1259411/posts
Message from Lt. Col. Wellman from the 101st Airborne, Ft. Campbell, KY
Commander Says Unlikely Large-Scale Removal of Explosives Occurred After U.S. Invasion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1259459/posts
ABC News - IAEA Says only 3 tons of high explosives left at Al QaQuaa when last checked
DRUDGE SIREN:
GERTZ // THURSDAY // WASH TIMES: Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has learned. John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, almost certainly removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad.
Russia tied to Iraq´s missing arms; Pentagon: Weaponry relocated before war
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Side note for Kerry lurkers. These explosives, along with 1/2 a million tons of other weapons, were under the control of a terrorist named Saddam. They would still be under his control if your guy had his way. Get a frickin' clue.
" that once troops left the base itself, people streamed in to steal computers and anything else of value from the offices. They also took munitions like artillery shells, he said. "
Given the choice, would looters take a box of unknown white powder or something tangible that they could sell or use ?
Logic, common sense, decency and two working neurons dictate the latter.
Kerry believes the former and also, that smiling US soldiers helped terrorists load their pick ups and probably demanded a tip.
Looks like NYT is trying to cover their butts now. If this continues, it will the equivalent of Bush's DUI report right before the 2000 elections, only worse.
Only the NYT could spin a 101st battle VICTORY into inducing the Iraqi forces . .
ROFL !!!!!!!!
If you put it to a tune, it just might work.
What the heck are Russian Special Forces doing moving this stuff to Syria? (please respond)
You didn't get to be a Chemical engineer in Traq unless you were a loyal Baathist. And I can guarantee you that you didn't get a job at this top secret facility unless your loyalty to Saddam was pretty certain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.