Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Urgent Warning on Iraqi Cache Issued in 1995
New York Sun ^ | 10/27/2004 | Eli Lake

Posted on 10/27/2004 8:07:20 AM PDT by foofoopowder

October 27, 2004 Edition > Section: Foreign

Printer-friendly version Email this article

Urgent Warning on Iraqi Cache Issued in 1995 BY ELI LAKE - Staff Reporter of the Sun October 27, 2004

WASHINGTON - Nine years ago, U.N. weapons inspectors urgently called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to demolish powerful plastic explosives in a facility that Iraq's interim government said this month was looted due to poor security.

The chief American weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, told The New York Sun yesterday that in 1995, when he was a member of the U.N. inspections team in Iraq, he urged the United Nations' atomic watchdog to remove tons of explosives that have since been declared missing.

Mr. Duelfer said he was rebuffed at the time by the Vienna-based agency because its officials were not convinced the presence of the HMX, RDX, and PETN explosives was directly related to Saddam Hussein's programs to amass weapons of mass destruction.

Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them.

By e-mail, Mr. Duelfer wrote the Sun, "The policy was if acquired for the WMD program and used for it, it should be subject for destruction. The HMX was just that. Nevertheless the IAEA decided to let Iraq keep the stuff, like they needed more explosives."

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duelfer; hmx; iraq; napalminthemorning; nytrogate; weapons; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
UN allowed Iraq to keep plastic explosives.
1 posted on 10/27/2004 8:07:21 AM PDT by foofoopowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder
Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them.

Well, they sure did a bang-up job.

2 posted on 10/27/2004 8:08:37 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder
Oooh. And who was president then? Why, Bill Clinton, of course. He could have bombed this facility during Operation Desert Fox.

Game, set and match.

3 posted on 10/27/2004 8:08:55 AM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Need a link for this.


4 posted on 10/27/2004 8:09:24 AM PDT by dirtboy (Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Of course this probably had NOTHING to do with the fact that Hussein was bribing UN officials and influential UN countries.... /sarcasm


5 posted on 10/27/2004 8:09:29 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Do you happen to have link for this one?


6 posted on 10/27/2004 8:10:02 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

And Clinton did nothing??!!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 10/27/2004 8:10:31 AM PDT by BellStar (Bush will win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: dirtboy

http://www.nysun.com/article/3826


9 posted on 10/27/2004 8:11:38 AM PDT by foofoopowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder
Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them.

Of course they did. Job security program for UN bureaucrats.

10 posted on 10/27/2004 8:11:47 AM PDT by PogySailor (Proud member of the RAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
And we're waiting for Bush to say something....
11 posted on 10/27/2004 8:11:50 AM PDT by unspun (RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

BTTT


12 posted on 10/27/2004 8:12:20 AM PDT by EdReform (Have you seen FAHRENHYPE 9/11? - www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240926/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

This answers a question that has been troubling me...why was Saddam allowed to stockpile such a weapons cache, especially after the first Gulf War.


13 posted on 10/27/2004 8:13:10 AM PDT by mass55th ("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Fox and talk radio need to get Duelfer on the air to discuss this. What good are U.N. weapons inspectors and the I.A.E.A. if they find prohibited weapons or explosives but then don't follow up to make sure the items were destroyed?


14 posted on 10/27/2004 8:13:34 AM PDT by texasmountainman (proud father of a U.S. Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

And we're waiting for Bush to say something....

Don't hold your breath.


15 posted on 10/27/2004 8:17:03 AM PDT by sarasotarepublican (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unspun

>>>And we're waiting for Bush to say something....<<<

Yes we are. And, any time in the next 5 days would probably be the best opportunity to do so. Does he realize there's an election next Tuesday? Just checking.


16 posted on 10/27/2004 8:18:46 AM PDT by bjmorris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: texasmountainman
What good are U.N. weapons inspectors and the I.A.E.A. if they find prohibited weapons or explosives but then don't follow up to make sure the items were destroyed?

Or fail to recognize the danger of "dual use" chemicals.

17 posted on 10/27/2004 8:19:07 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (If it talks like a liberal, votes like a liberal and spends like a liberal, it's a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder
RE WMD if one lb of this took out an airplane with say, 100 people on board, and they have 350 tons or enough to bring down 700,000 planes with 100 people that is 70 million people, is that not massive destruction?
18 posted on 10/27/2004 8:23:39 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Something else for the NY Times et al to ignore.


19 posted on 10/27/2004 8:24:13 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder

Exactly...

If IAEA had followed the recommendations of it's more responsible members Bill Clinton and the UN could have made Saddam get rid of the RDX... right?

Just another point to underscore the contribution G W Bush has made to our safety.


20 posted on 10/27/2004 8:26:04 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson