Skip to comments.
Urgent Warning on Iraqi Cache Issued in 1995
New York Sun ^
| 10/27/2004
| Eli Lake
Posted on 10/27/2004 8:07:20 AM PDT by foofoopowder
October 27, 2004 Edition > Section: Foreign
Printer-friendly version Email this article
Urgent Warning on Iraqi Cache Issued in 1995 BY ELI LAKE - Staff Reporter of the Sun October 27, 2004
WASHINGTON - Nine years ago, U.N. weapons inspectors urgently called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to demolish powerful plastic explosives in a facility that Iraq's interim government said this month was looted due to poor security.
The chief American weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, told The New York Sun yesterday that in 1995, when he was a member of the U.N. inspections team in Iraq, he urged the United Nations' atomic watchdog to remove tons of explosives that have since been declared missing.
Mr. Duelfer said he was rebuffed at the time by the Vienna-based agency because its officials were not convinced the presence of the HMX, RDX, and PETN explosives was directly related to Saddam Hussein's programs to amass weapons of mass destruction.
Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them.
By e-mail, Mr. Duelfer wrote the Sun, "The policy was if acquired for the WMD program and used for it, it should be subject for destruction. The HMX was just that. Nevertheless the IAEA decided to let Iraq keep the stuff, like they needed more explosives."
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duelfer; hmx; iraq; napalminthemorning; nytrogate; weapons; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
UN allowed Iraq to keep plastic explosives.
To: foofoopowder
Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them. Well, they sure did a bang-up job.
2
posted on
10/27/2004 8:08:37 AM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
To: foofoopowder
Oooh. And who was president then? Why, Bill Clinton, of course. He could have bombed this facility during Operation Desert Fox.
Game, set and match.
3
posted on
10/27/2004 8:08:55 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
To: foofoopowder
4
posted on
10/27/2004 8:09:24 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Tagline temporarily out of commission due to excessive intake of gin-soaked raisins)
To: foofoopowder
Of course this probably had NOTHING to do with the fact that Hussein was bribing UN officials and influential UN countries.... /sarcasm
To: foofoopowder
Do you happen to have link for this one?
To: foofoopowder
And Clinton did nothing??!!!!!!!!!
7
posted on
10/27/2004 8:10:31 AM PDT
by
BellStar
(Bush will win!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: dirtboy
To: foofoopowder
Instead of accepting recommendations to destroy the stocks, Mr. Duelfer said, the atomic-energy agency opted to continue to monitor them. Of course they did. Job security program for UN bureaucrats.
10
posted on
10/27/2004 8:11:47 AM PDT
by
PogySailor
(Proud member of the RAM)
To: BellStar
And we're waiting for Bush to say something....
11
posted on
10/27/2004 8:11:50 AM PDT
by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: foofoopowder
12
posted on
10/27/2004 8:12:20 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Have you seen FAHRENHYPE 9/11? - www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240926/posts)
To: foofoopowder
This answers a question that has been troubling me...why was Saddam allowed to stockpile such a weapons cache, especially after the first Gulf War.
13
posted on
10/27/2004 8:13:10 AM PDT
by
mass55th
("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
To: foofoopowder
Fox and talk radio need to get Duelfer on the air to discuss this. What good are U.N. weapons inspectors and the I.A.E.A. if they find prohibited weapons or explosives but then don't follow up to make sure the items were destroyed?
14
posted on
10/27/2004 8:13:34 AM PDT
by
texasmountainman
(proud father of a U.S. Marine)
To: unspun
And we're waiting for Bush to say something....
Don't hold your breath.
15
posted on
10/27/2004 8:17:03 AM PDT
by
sarasotarepublican
(Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
To: unspun
>>>And we're waiting for Bush to say something....<<<
Yes we are. And, any time in the next 5 days would probably be the best opportunity to do so. Does he realize there's an election next Tuesday? Just checking.
16
posted on
10/27/2004 8:18:46 AM PDT
by
bjmorris
To: texasmountainman
What good are U.N. weapons inspectors and the I.A.E.A. if they find prohibited weapons or explosives but then don't follow up to make sure the items were destroyed? Or fail to recognize the danger of "dual use" chemicals.
17
posted on
10/27/2004 8:19:07 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(If it talks like a liberal, votes like a liberal and spends like a liberal, it's a liberal.)
To: foofoopowder
RE WMD if one lb of this took out an airplane with say, 100 people on board, and they have 350 tons or enough to bring down 700,000 planes with 100 people that is 70 million people, is that not massive destruction?
To: foofoopowder
Something else for the NY Times et al to ignore.
19
posted on
10/27/2004 8:24:13 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: foofoopowder
Exactly...
If IAEA had followed the recommendations of it's more responsible members Bill Clinton and the UN could have made Saddam get rid of the RDX... right?
Just another point to underscore the contribution G W Bush has made to our safety.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson