Posted on 10/26/2004 10:57:48 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Sorry about the double post. The posting thing is acting up again.
SOP for the Dems. In a recent interview with that useful scumbag, Dick Morris, he figured the Dems would spring two or three surprises this week. There are probably interesting things in reserve on both sides. After the NYT debacle, it would amaze me if any facet of the MSM had the gall to run yet another anti-Bush "scoop"...but I've been continually amazed by this election.
Paula Zahn is asking everyone why the president has not made a statement regarding this important story.
I suspect that the answer is that he is giving them enough rope to hang themselves. With the help of FReepers of course.
|
|
||
| Rush just read a CNN story from 1/2003 "Al Aqaa a WMD site"...anyone have a link (vanity) | ||
| The Iraqi explosives story CBS and the New York Times ran yesterday is a fraud. These weapons were not there when US troops went to this site in 2003. The IAEA and its head, the anti-American Mohammed El Baradei, leaked a false letter on this issue to the media to embarrass the Bush administration. Here you go: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/01/24/sprj.irq.inspections/index.html Here is a link to DRUDGE story on it: Fox also had an article about Qa Qaa Site: |
||
I'm sorry, but the people who will vote for Kerry are the most ignorant segment of the American voters. Honesty and integrity mean little or nothing to them. They believe every single thing that their liberal masters tell them. For them it's all about what is government going to do for me. This scandal will have the same effect on them as did Rather-gate, Wilson-gate, Berger-gate, revelations of Kerry's ties to Hanoi, his (Kerry) pathetic and constant lies, and all the other garbage that should have ensured a Bush landslide. In short very little or nothing at all.
But The Wash Times and NY Post influence pales in comparison to that of the big liberal dailies like the NY Times or The Washington Post. Combined with the dominance of the big three lib tv networks and that of Time and Newsweek in the periodical area, you have a tremendous obstacle of liberal dreck to wade through before you can find an honest or trustworthy newspaper, periodical, or tv news channel. But thank god for the internet, talk radio, and Fox News. Beacons of truth in the black world of liberal media.
Sadly, so true.
But there may be a few hundred thousand here and there who, if presented with some facts, will "feel" the truth in it.
BUMP!
And hang they will.
More and more viewers are going to Fox News to learn what's going on.
Somehow, it's Boosh's fault.LOL
The NY Post is a good paper. I read it often. Enjoy.
"... you utterly lack integrity...."
It looks like Kerry's mother knew what she was talking about when she reminded Kerry about..."integrity, integrity, integrity!" It is obvous that integrity is something Kerry is completely devoid of.
That's "integrity, integrity, integrity", according to sKerry's Mom!
Greetings, here's my follow-up article to "A New Low For Liberals", titled (surprisingly enough) "A New Low For Liberals (Part II)" ;o)
A New Low For Liberals (Part II)
By Edward L. Daley
The other day I wrote an article concerning the recent Al Qaqaa storage facility issue we've all been hearing so much about this week titled 'A New Low For Liberals'. It was my contention (and still is) that John Kerry and the left-wing media were wrong to have jumped to the conclusion that the American military allowed a large amount of explosives to be "looted" from that site after the area had been overrun by our forces near the beginning of the Iraq War.
I also pointed out the seemingly coordinated efforts by the Kerry campaign, the New York Times, and CBS News to use the information they had acquired to defame the president, without bothering to make sure the story was true before making it known to the American people. At that time they had not provided any real proof to support their claims. Even as I write this article, they have not offered irrefutable evidence to back up their assertions, and I believe now, as I believed then, that they would have run the story even if they themselves believed it to be fallacious.
If the story should inevitably prove to be true beyond all reasonable doubt, I will be more than happy to admit that my assertion that "the story wasn't true" was incorrect. Yet even if that turns out to be the case, it will not mean that Mr. Kerry, or the various liberal media organizations I referred to in my previous article, were right to jump the gun with respect to the subject at hand.
The fact remains that no one could have stated with any reasonable amount of certainty on the 25th of this month that the explosives in question were removed from Al Qaqaa after the war had begun. The Kerry camp and its confederates still cannot do so, nor is it likely they will be able to anytime soon. To conclude such a thing without any real proof at one's disposal is simply asinine, and to state publicly that such unsupported opinions amount to fact, especially so close to the presidential election, is nothing short of despicable.
By any means, ever since I wrote the aforementioned article, I have been receiving e-mails from various leftists who are all too willing to point out to me that further information has come to light concerning the Al Qaqaa issue. Of course, none of them seem to be interested in ALL the information available regarding this subject... only the information which they believe justifies their support of John Kerry.
One such critic of my opinions on the matter is a person whom I will refer to simply as Joshua. I have decided not to include his last name or the city and state from which he hails in this article, since I believe it would be unfair of me to publicly demean him in such a format. After all, he has no means of defending himself at this time.
Still, I do feel that it is appropriate to share with all of you his postings to me, and my responses to him. The following exchanges occurred this morning, and I am adding them here because I believe they will give you some insight into the mindset of this individual (and what is likely the similar attitudes of many other left-wingers).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.