Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ruralgal

Well, this should make some Bush supporters stay home. Or at least the NY Times/Kerry campaign hope so.


2 posted on 10/26/2004 5:07:04 AM PDT by PilloryHillary (John Kerry is a traitor! johnfkerrysucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: johnfkerrysucks

And keep other Bush supporters from staying home.


4 posted on 10/26/2004 5:08:09 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks

I don't believe this. The NYT is really going full boar trying to smear the President.


5 posted on 10/26/2004 5:08:37 AM PDT by GopherGOPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks

I gotta think he's just pandering for the moderates or something. I'm disappointed, he needs to cater to his BASE.


10 posted on 10/26/2004 5:10:46 AM PDT by ruralgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks

He just lost my vote. Oh wait, I already voted. Nice try NYT.


50 posted on 10/26/2004 5:30:27 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks

If this makes supporters of the President stay home it would be quite frankly stupid and petty. Social issues are like it or not at the periphery in this election and staying home is just as good as voting for Sen. Kerry and an agenda, which is in effect bolstering a position on social issues that couldn't be further from those positions held by opponets of Gay marriage and civil unions for homosexuals. My word to those who fly off the handle on this one, wise up.


68 posted on 10/26/2004 5:38:00 AM PDT by miloklancy (The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks
Or at least the NY Times/Kerry campaign hope so.

Yup. I can't wait to read the 100+ replies (It's only just after 6am here so y'all have a head start on we westerners) and see who the easy patsies are.

124 posted on 10/26/2004 6:11:19 AM PDT by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: johnfkerrysucks

No. This still supports the definition and legalities of
marriage between a man and a woman, and protects the
government from having to provide benefits. He is asserting
states rights, which is not a bad thing.


211 posted on 10/26/2004 8:16:32 AM PDT by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson