There was nothing wrong with Conyers' demand for an investigation of Perle. Even before he did this, a number of us right here on FreeRepublic wondered why the hell Perle was allowed within a mile of the U.S. Defense Department in the first place. His presence on the Defense Policy Board was very suspicious to me, particularly because the DPB didn't even exist until early 2001. In light of: A) Perle's track record in the Reagan administration, and B) the revelations of his lobbying career on behalf of a front company for the Red Chinese Army, I speculated that the Defense Policy Board was created specifically for one or both of the following reasons:
1. So people like Perle could serve in an advisory role at the Pentagon without obtaining the required security clearances, or
2. So people like Perle could serve in an advisory role at the Pentagon without giving up their lucrative lobbying careers -- even on behalf of Communist China.
At least I've been consistent about this kind of sh!t. I seem to remember a lot of justifiable outrage among conservatives when the players were Bernard Schwartz and Loral instead of Richard Perle and Global Crossing.
I wasn't defending Perle and his lobbying controversies. I was criticizing your seeming effort to discredit this administration's foreign policy in the WOT and how it pertains to Iraq, based on the lobbying controversies of Perle.
The irony is, that the honorable Jeremiah Denton is a strong believer in the Bush foreign policy and the WOT and how it pertains to Iraq.
As I said, things really aren't that simple.