To: Timeout
Anyone with a brain can tell you it was the UN who blew it by not getting this stuff out of Iraq. If it was so important, why did they allow themselves to be 'convinced' to leave the explosives for peaceful uses?
HEY, WHAT ABOUT THE 248,000 TONS OF EXPLOSIVES DESTROYED OR CAPTURED?
28 posted on
10/25/2004 6:32:25 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: finnman69
I predicted last night that this was another great Karl Rove rope-a-dope story. Kerry bit off on it big time.
To: finnman69
What is truly amazing is that the left accepts as a matter of course the fact that 380 tons of HE can mysteriously disappear but that 10 tons of Sarin, ten tons of mustard gas and a suitcase full of biocrud can not.
It would take a convoy of almost 100 tractor trailers to move the HE and 4 to move the WMD.
If Rove can't use this to knockout Kerry and his left wing Garmara, he ain't worth a crap.
71 posted on
10/25/2004 6:38:24 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
(Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
To: finnman69; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
" If it was so important, why did they allow themselves to be 'convinced' to leave the explosives for peaceful uses?" Because to the UN, Terrorism IS a peaceful use.
Thanks for the ping Tonk!
227 posted on
10/25/2004 7:10:20 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(There are thousands of men of higher moral character than Hanoi John Kerry waiting on Death Row)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson