To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
I did a bit of digging
![](http://home.swipnet.se/skinart/horoskop/oxen.gif)
PING...
2 posted on
10/25/2004 12:06:38 PM PDT by
OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
U.N. weapons inspectors went repeatedly to the vast al Qa Qaa complex -- most recently on March 8 -- but found nothing during spot visits to some of the 1,100 buildings at the site 25 miles south of Baghdad. And now the NYT, Kerry and others are claiming that 380 of explosive material is now missing????
I'm telling you ... that NYT article smells
6 posted on
10/25/2004 12:11:50 PM PDT by
Mo1
(This Sept 10th attitude is no way to protect our country)
To: OXENinFLA
Hi OXEN
I also did a bit of digging to see if these "missing explosives" and a known stockpile of
500 tons of Uranium were in the same facility. I thought you may find some of this interesting.
In May of this year, U.S. Forces were prohibited from removing
500 tons of Uranium from
Tuwaitha.
Reference: San Diego Union Tribune
It seems
Al-qa-qaa is only a few kilometers away, but it is closer to
Salman Pac.
Here is a good image of Salman Pac. Click on it for High Resolution:
34 posted on
10/25/2004 12:44:06 PM PDT by
DocRock
(Support the tagline tax relief fund. Donations can be made on my homepage.)
To: OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
98 posted on
10/25/2004 9:37:06 PM PDT by
PowerPro
(REMEMBER: Every State's a Swing State Until the Votes are Counted ... Go VOTE!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson