Why Women Like President Bush

Men's News Daily ^ | October 25, 2004 | Kevin McCullough

[presidio9]

[trussell]

Hey!! Looky what the mods did to the title!!

[ohioWfan]

Gentlemen........can you tell me exactly how what you are doing to this thread is different from Whoopi Goldberg's crudity?

This is a wonderful article about a President who respects and is gaining the respect of women, and, IMO, you have hijacked it, and made it unpleasant for most of the people who appreciate the article, and the moral quality in the President that we respect so much.

[Constitution Day]

Interesting.
Why Women Like Bush is in fact the original title; I guess some prude hit the abuse button.

So much for the rule of sticking to the actual title!

[LadyPilgrim]

It takes a rotten squash to have any trouble with this statement.
Like DUH!!!

[presidio9]

Lighten up Francis.

[najida]

1. He is a good man.
2. He loves his wife.
3. He loves this country.
4. He doesn't back down.
5. He is the father I never had.
6. He looks really good in jeans.

[Constitution Day]

I don't see it's even possible for the original poster of the thread (you) to hijack it.

Looks like that whiner is really the hijacker...

[ohioWfan]

No problem.......I'll leave, now that I got my 2 cents worth in. Just won't be pinging any of my friends to this lovely article.....

btw, I didn't hit the abuse button, in case anyone wondered, and I ain't no prude. ;o)

[ohioWfan]

LOL! Love your contorted logic!

[Old Sarge]

Properly chastised...

[Little Ray]

Thats why some people are voting for him...

Personally, I can't figure out why anybody is voting for him, either, but my sister and my mother are. I think my mother is voting for "free health care" as if such a thing exists. My sister is probably anti-war. I gave up on both of them a long time ago. I love 'em, but...

[Constitution Day]

That's just plain logic.

Someone who hijacks a thread, in my opinion, is ALWAYS someone other than the original poster.

[gobucks]

Already Posted Thread

Just a bit of info for you over here.

The title here you'll note does not have "President" in it - and this thread is clearly not hijacked - though you've got to wonder how it could have turned out that way given the bias of so many dirty old men here at FR...)

[G.Mason]

"Gentlemen........can you tell me exactly how what you are doing to this thread is different from Whoopi Goldberg's crudity?"

You need a tree to fall on you?

Read the title.

It's about calling Bush, PRESIDENT Bush! Not simply Bush.

After all, isnt that what the "enemy" calls him?

I think you will find that related to in other posts here.

You may now go back to your lifes work ... saving us from ourselves.

[G.Mason]

"Hey!! Looky what the mods did to the title!!"

Yeah ... Now that's a title with respect, and which should lead to an honest discussion.

You see ... words do have meaning. ;)

[trussell]

Some don't seem to be happy with the change in title. I think it looks better to address the President with respect.

[ohioWfan]

I wasn't accusing presidio of hijacking his own thread.

I was pinging him to my comment to be polite as I am here.

The article IS on women respecting President Bush isn't it?

[ohioWfan]

I still haven't got a straight answer to my question.

Why should we be outraged when Whoopi Goldberg makes dirty jokes about the President's name, and give you a pass when you do the same thing?

It's a simple, and IMO, a legitimate question........ and, btw, I have absolutely no interest in saving you from anything.

[evets]

I like Bush women.