Newspaper Casts Doubt on Kerry's Talks with UN Security Council (or...Kerry LIED)

CNSNEWS.com ^ | 10/25/04 | Susan Jones

[lsee]

Mwah-hahahahaha...

[international american]

Kerry lied?? Oh come now....ROTF!

[airborne]

Pathological!

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Well, he did talk to them before he decided not to.

[ClearCase_guy]

Better headline: "More lies from Kerry, as Dem Desperation grows"

Next to: "Cheering throngs greet Bush at campaign stop"

[tomnbeverly]

America should question Kerry's truthfullness.

Well I actually did go to meet them before I actually met them which I never really did.

I might make a mistake about how I talk about meeting with leaders but at least I didn't actually go to the UN and present a case to the Leaders. Which is worse?

Is Kerry INSANE?

[yoe]

Mr. Kerry is less than trueful about 95% of what he says...as is the MSM...

[mewzilla]

I'll point this out on one more thread, and then I'll shut up :)

Kerry has been talking about his contacts with the Axis of Weasels for months, bragging about his access and his ties. The Weasels don't gainsay him until now? And they seem to be denying meetings. How about any other kinds of contacts?

What if, for once, Kerry wasn't lying? Whay could Kerry have done for the Weasels that makes it preferable to be labeled a liar?

I say more investigation needs to be done. We shouldn't take Kerry's, or the Weasels', word for jack!

[FreePaul]

...as it clashes with one of his central foreign-policy campaign themes -- honesty," the article said.

Honesty has never been a consideration in any of Kerry's actions. He has made a career of lying whenever he thought that it would serve his purpose.

[sodpoodle]

"So I sat with the French and British, Germans, with the entire Security Council, and we spent a couple of hours talking about what they saw as the path to a united front in order to be able to deal with Saddam Hussein".

Let's hear more Senator Kerry! Who were these people? What did they actually say to you and did the French explain they had too many productive deals with Saddam that they intended to support him?

Is there video of this interview?

[Jose Roberto]

The lies keep on coming. I am not surprised by this, the libs don't even care, they take Kerry and Michael Moore at face value, what can you say?

[ServesURight]

[sweetiepiezer]

Kerry Lied Good Men Died!!!!!!!!!

[mewzilla]

Here's another question: Why was the Axis Of Weasels so convinced they could keep us from invading Iraq? Inquiring minds want to know...

[JustaCowgirl]

It isn't just the fact that he's a serial liar. The amazing thing is that in this instance he told an absolute whopper several times about something that would be easily checked and found to be false! The only surprising thing to me is that it took this long. I knew that was a lie the minute it came out of his mouth.

Is Kerry so out of touch with reality that he didn't think someone would check the story and find it false? Or is this a symptom of extreme narcissism (which has got to be a form of insanity). Or does he just believe the media are so in the tank for him that he can say anything and get away with it? Unfortunately, he probably will get away with it, because the leftist media will refuse to cover it.

[badpacifist]

Both "bombshells" are duds really. The Ny Times will get more MSM airtime and already is. The difference is that one is our militarys fault and Kerry's exploitation of that can be turned back on him. Also security council issue shows Kerry is lying, but that isn't news.

[EdReform]

Ping

[new cruelty]

It is highly doubtful that the msm will even mention this story.

[Arnold Zephel]

Johnny Nuance will come up with some elaborate semantical ballet to explain this obvious untruth. Something to the effect of "It was an unofficial meeting, so there were no records of the meeting kept."

The people that want to believe him will believe him. If this is the "October Surprise" we have been anticipating, it is a pretty pathetic one. Most reasonable people already know that Kerry is a pathological liar. But, it seems that roughly 45% of Americans, aided by a venal partisan press, want to believe his lies, so they will no matter the evidence the contrary.