Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Guardian's Calling All Assassins Story Unleashes Secret Service
Toronto Free Press ^ | October 25, 2004 | Judi McLeod

Posted on 10/24/2004 5:08:47 PM PDT by Ex-Dem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: Ex-Dem
Any source coming out of the liberal bastion of Canada should be taken with a grain of salt. If I see a similar posting on a respected U.S. Government site I would take it to heart. Suppression is a tool of the Democratic party and a threat to our free society to voice any outrage to the liberal agenda. This party is borderline dangerous on the path it has chosen to endorse.
81 posted on 10/24/2004 6:33:57 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

Dare we hope that Brooker "trip" and fall down a huge flight of stairs?


82 posted on 10/24/2004 6:39:10 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The Secret Service probably has no jurisdiction in the UK, but this professor knows that. Its a leftist and he wants to close down the Drudge Report.

Thats all it is.

83 posted on 10/24/2004 6:45:52 PM PDT by GeronL (FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
The Guardian's exec editor (Albert Scardino) is an American who won a Pulitzer in 1984 for editorials and later worked for the NYT. His June 23, 2004 editorial for The Guardian gives some insight into his journalistic approach:

In defence of irresponsible journalism

Maybe we need less official and quasi-official scrutiny, not more. Maybe the time has come for even more strident and confrontational reporting. Until we free public information from government secrecy, we may be exhibiting too much courtesy, deference and respect for authority.

I'd say Brooker's piece is "Exhibit A" for irresponsible journalism. Mr. Scardino must be so proud.

84 posted on 10/24/2004 6:46:03 PM PDT by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

That is not what I said.

Why is it necessary to take a chance on endangering any president or his family by wording a headline in such a way or giving an advanced itinerary of where a president's daughter will be time and place, when she is in another country? Drudge could have exposed the article in the Guardian without using those words. It just would not have been as attention grabbing.

Have you no respect for President Busch or his family? Do you really think these actions where safety are concerned can be likened to, in your words, "a threat to democracy"?

Because this man is doing his job and fighting to keep us safe, he is in a much more vulnerable position that Clinton was ever in while playing hide the cigar.

Give us all a break.


85 posted on 10/24/2004 6:51:36 PM PDT by Proud Conservative2 (We have to be held accountable for our actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: macbee

Sounds like your typical leftist, anti-establishment, anti-conformist way of thinking.

In his heart, this Brooker fellow probably wouldn't be sorry if some psycho were to try to take out Bush, despite his newspaper's apology on his behalf. (Actually, it's interesting that the apology was written by the Guardian, it didn't actually come from Brooker himself...). I don't think he was joking on that point.


86 posted on 10/24/2004 6:54:47 PM PDT by Ex-Dem (AFL-CIO - Where organized labor becomes organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Proud Conservative2

Look, we're all on the same side. Some of us don't agree that Drudge was inciting anything other than highlighting the stupidity of the Leftist Guardian. Turn down your gain and lighten up, Francis.


87 posted on 10/24/2004 7:15:36 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (What can you expect from a political party full of master-debators?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Proud Conservative2

It's called censorship.
The American people have a right to know what the English paper that endorses Kerry wants their kool-aid drinkers to do.
Kerry himself stated he wanted to take a rifle to his first debate with Bush, and made a nastier comment in '88 about shooting Quayle if Bush I died.
That is news. People have a right to know and make a decision based on the facts.


88 posted on 10/24/2004 7:36:49 PM PDT by mabelkitty (W is the Peoples' President ; Kerry is the Elite Establishment's President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Proud Conservative2
Did it ever occur to anyone that Matt(as much as we like him) might have added to the potential danger in having that particular wording posted in red on his website?

Sure. And papers reporting on fires increase the likelihood of arson. C'mon. Having a ridiculous headline isn't even on par with the Guardian's call for assassins.

89 posted on 10/24/2004 7:43:35 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Leftists think they can tax us into "prosperity" and regulate us into "liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
Does this fit his MO?

Yes, and the Jackpeace in the email sounds familiar as well.

90 posted on 10/24/2004 8:37:00 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He is one of the strangest human beings on the planet.

Didn't he used to post something along the lines that he was the only lawyer certified as sane by the Florida Bar?

I was only a lurker back in those days.

91 posted on 10/24/2004 8:40:19 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine
Answering media inquiries about his "mysterious bulge", President Bush identified it as "my spine."

LOL NO wonder Dems and talking heads didn't recognize it. Probably quite a few confused RINOs too.

92 posted on 10/24/2004 8:55:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Can I get me a second ballot here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
This is to be found this morning at www.drudgereport.com. The owner of the Drudge Report is Matt Drudge, who lives on South Beach (Miami Beach), Florida. I would encourage the Secret Services Miami office to pay Mr. Drudge a visit to tell him he needs to comply with the law and take down that screaming red headline

So the Secret Service should arrest Drudge for reporting the news, you ignorant little fascist? I guess they don't teach the Constitution in law school anymore. And Booker is a Brit, the SS has no jurisdiction in Britain. Lousy squealing little rat bastard.

93 posted on 10/24/2004 11:26:33 PM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Because his website is so popular, and could have been read by some wacko who would feel the need to carry out that psycho Brit's wishes. It was irresponsible on Drudges part.


94 posted on 10/24/2004 11:32:30 PM PDT by ladyinred (John Kerry is flipping off America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

Notice how the Toronto Free Press (our Canadian Liberals) immediately listed Matt Drudges home as South Beach FL. I guess that little piece of advice for anyone wanting to send him a thank you note...or was it another form of threat. The retraction this morning from the UK Guardian hits on deaf ears here. I'm still troubled by the *****ADVERTISERS***** American Express and Toyota. When does support for terrorist threats against the President have no responsibility. I've not seen a retraction from the *****ADVERTISERS*****; they're still on the UKG site.


95 posted on 10/25/2004 2:36:33 AM PDT by AMHN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N. Beaujon

If the SS wants Drudge to take the headline down, he should do it.


96 posted on 10/25/2004 3:28:38 AM PDT by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Check6

A list of all "American" corporations advertising in the Guardian would be most useful. Personally, I won't go to their site or buy their paper.


97 posted on 10/25/2004 3:30:53 AM PDT by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Check6
If the SS wants Drudge to take the headline down, he should do it.

There was nothing in the article that stated that the SS wanted Drudge to take down the report. No one is more sensitive to threats on our President's life than I am. What Drudge did was not to unhinge the whackos (they're not reading Drudge) but to expose the Guardian, the whacko Eurotrash and their American synchophant counterparts all of which, I feel, is long overdue.

I'm not sure people are aware of just how sick "main stream" liberalism has become. Forget the fringes, they are off the graph. This is main stream for these nut bags. They didn't think twice about publishing this in a broadsheet? It's time everyone's eyes were opened about how dangerous almost any form of liberalism has become.
98 posted on 10/25/2004 8:11:09 PM PDT by N. Beaujon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson