That is not what I said.
Why is it necessary to take a chance on endangering any president or his family by wording a headline in such a way or giving an advanced itinerary of where a president's daughter will be time and place, when she is in another country? Drudge could have exposed the article in the Guardian without using those words. It just would not have been as attention grabbing.
Have you no respect for President Busch or his family? Do you really think these actions where safety are concerned can be likened to, in your words, "a threat to democracy"?
Because this man is doing his job and fighting to keep us safe, he is in a much more vulnerable position that Clinton was ever in while playing hide the cigar.
Give us all a break.
Look, we're all on the same side. Some of us don't agree that Drudge was inciting anything other than highlighting the stupidity of the Leftist Guardian. Turn down your gain and lighten up, Francis.
It's called censorship.
The American people have a right to know what the English paper that endorses Kerry wants their kool-aid drinkers to do.
Kerry himself stated he wanted to take a rifle to his first debate with Bush, and made a nastier comment in '88 about shooting Quayle if Bush I died.
That is news. People have a right to know and make a decision based on the facts.