Posted on 10/24/2004 9:31:12 AM PDT by THJNewYorkCity
If only a 527 Group would create one more ad--probably one that Bush/Cheney can't do (for some reason September 11 is supposed to be off limits)....
But the other question is this...Have Americans REALLY considered the man that Kerry is and that it's a straight line from trashing his fellow soldiers while protesting the war in Vietnam, through 20 years in the US Senate voting against most weapons systems and money for the CIA? All of this culminated in Kerry's vote against the first Iraq war. If he wouldn't go to war after Saddam had INVADED Kuwait and France joined a coalition to drive him out (they weren't bribed yet) along with the UN (they weren't bribed yet), then when will Kerry EVER go to war to protect American interests? It's truly laughable that he would assert that he "defended this country as a young man". If he DID it was for four months followed by years cutting his country off at the knees.
So the ad should do this:
Show Bush on the rubble at the World Trade Center....talking to the workers
Show Kerry testifying before Congress along with pictures of him throwing away his medals...
And end with Kerry's votes against defense and intelligence.
What could be clearer?
Can a majority of the American people POSSIBLY believe that John Kerry has the GUTS to wage war against Islamofascism? Can a majority possibly believe he wouldn't take office doing what he did in Vietnam--spending every waking hour trying to figure out how to bug out? Can a majority POSSIBLY believe that Kerry, whose faith in the UN is obviously greater than his faith in the Catholic Church, would do anything other than give a veto to the thieves and dictators at the UN? And finally, can the American people believe that a man who has "married up" TWICE and whose life of luxury could never be recreated by the earnings of a divorced former president, do anything other than launch a co-presidency far more damaging than the one Bill Clinton attempted with Hillary? Never has a billionaire been in the White House, and never has the billionaire been the First Lady--a woman whose primary conviction is that she knows better than anyone? If John Kerry were a man of backbone and conviction, one might not be concerned, but John Kerry has shown that no belief or conviction is worth holding if it will cost him votes.
And finally, as we hear him giving a political speech in a Florida church (he's reported to be planning two), shouldn't we wonder if this man of strong Catholic faith is going to Mass?
What I keep waiting to see is the ad that gives a preview of the celebration in the streets the terrorist will surely have should Bush lose.
I have seen liberals face turn ashen gray when I bring this up.
Another newbie vanity? Yikes :(
My recommendation to the Bush campaign would be to ask Nancy Reagan to tape an endorsement of President Bush on behalf of Ronnie and put it on the air immediately. That would blow the Liberals out of the water.
What a great second ad for a 527 to do. Just show the rejoicing Palestinians on September 11....and just ask the question:
We know that SOME people will be happy if Kerry wins the White House.
The commercial wouldn't have to do much more.
BRILLIANT! Tough, but brilliant.
I agree, a 527 would have to do it. The MSM would have a cow.
And of course what is never pointed out is how bad things COULD HAVE BEEN. Sure, we lost jobs on Bush's watch, but we've never been attacked like that before. The stock market could have gone into free fall--we could have gone into another great Depression; more attacks could have succeeded by now, all kinds of horrible things could have happened. But look where we are compared to where we COULD have been...or even where we were on September 12!!!!!
I keep wondering why no one says it is quite evident that the planning for 9/11 wasn't on Bush's shift but was in the planning stage for 2 years on Clinton's shift....it is quite evident all folks need to do is read the book, "Dereliction of Duty" on Bill Clinton.
I think there ought to be an ad about the military vote. I understand our soldiers in Iraq are voting over 80% for Bush. Don't we owe these young and women a decent leader...one they TRUST....one they RESPECT? How will these faithful young Americans feel if a traitor becomes Commander in Chief?? What an insult their sacrifice!!!
I agree with you. John Kerry's entire campain is a war protest and hurts our military....it totally gives comfort to the enemy.....it is very anti-American Military.
ABC News Democrat Presidential Candidates Debate, Columbia, SC, 5/3/03
KERRY: "George, I said at the time I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity, but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him."
ABC NEWS’ GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: "Now, Governor Dean, you’ve criticized Senator Kerry on the campaign trail saying he’s tried to have it both ways on the issue of Iraq. Was that answer clear enough for you?"
FORMER GOV. HOWARD DEAN (D-VT): "[I] think this was the wrong war at the wrong time ..."
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
Lawrence O'Donnell went ballistic today on The McLaughlin Report claiming that 9/11 was Bush and Cheney's fault. The Democrats were supposed to hold back on this one, so as far as I'm concerned, the doors are open. Time for recriminations. It WAS Bill Clinton's fault....and if HE didn't have "the stomach"--as Ed Koch puts it--then surely John Kerry won't. So as we see Palestinians and other Arabs dancing in the streets as Kerry is elected, Zarqawi and others will know that they can dodge the Kerry police and plan their next big attack on the US.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.