Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

The main problem with a dirty bomb is that the news media will blow it (pun intended) all out of proportion.

Even Japan and Germany in WW2 had the ability to make dirty bombs, it's just that they were more educated and less sensationalistic than the journalists of today (i.e. they knew better than to deploy a militarily useless weapon).

If your radiation source isn't engaging in a chain reaction, then its lethality is limited to people either breathing it in as dust or hanging on to pieces of it like a souvenier trophy necklace.

Brief exposures to non-chain-reaction radiation sources are trivial to your health.

Sadly, our modern news media will scream "PANIC" and "NUCLEAR ATTACK" at the first detonation of a dirty bomb, when the reality is that a dirty bomb is just a bomb...whose dust you don't want to breath and whose schrapnel you don't want to wear as jewelry.

15 posted on 10/23/2004 5:01:01 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Sadly, our modern news media will scream "PANIC" and "NUCLEAR ATTACK" at the first detonation of a dirty bomb, when the reality is that a dirty bomb is just a bomb..

I don't worry so much about a dirty bomb as I do about nuclear littering. A bomb advertises itself. But what if they just dropped the stuff in a high-traffic area?

19 posted on 10/23/2004 5:25:57 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson