Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLAME CONGRESS (Vaccines For Children++ Program -- 1994 -- drove out manufacturers)
New York Post ^ | October 22, 2004 | ROBERT M. GOLDBERG

Posted on 10/22/2004 11:03:43 AM PDT by OESY

America's flu vaccine shortage has become a campaign issue, with Sen, John Kerry blaming President Bush for failing to take steps to assure a reliable supply of shots this year. That's a typical Kerry tactic: Blame the president for a problem he's been trying to solve — and which Kerry and other politicians created....

The answer is that Congress decided 10 years ago to have the government buy up most of the vaccines at fixed, below-market prices. The Vaccines for Children Program, established by the Clinton administration and a Democratic Congress in 1994, federalized much of the once-private U.S. market for vaccines — vastly expanding the government's role as price-setter and production manager....

Pitched as a way to improve development and supply, VFC wrote price controls on vaccines into federal law. Faced with government-set low prices — and with development and production costs soaring thanks to frivolous lawsuits, other new regulations and the need to invest in new technology — companies have been pulling out of the vaccine business in droves.

President Bush lifted the price caps when he came to office — but VFC also made the government the main purchaser of flu and pediatric vaccines, moving it from about 30 percent of the market to 65 percent and rising... [resulting in] pitifully low prices for the existing stable of vaccines.

Bush has also tried to reduce development costs, to no avail. His effort to limit the liability of companies that make vaccines for the public health and fight bioterror has been thwarted by Kerry, Edwards and other leading Democrats. And the same politicians that blame the president for not getting the FDA to speed up vaccine approvals were responsible for demanding that the agency set up tougher and more expensive regulations for testing and manufacturing shots....

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biuoshield; bush; drugs; edwards; fda; flu; foodanddrug; forchildren; gregg; hillary; kennedy; kerry; lieberman; pediatrics; pharmaceuticals; schumer; tortreform; triallawyers; vaccines; vfc
Robert Goldberg is the director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute.
1 posted on 10/22/2004 11:03:49 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Senator Kunte Klinte

If one is to believe Sen. Schumer's campaign ads, he wants to destroy the rest of the drug industry, just as his Democrats led by Daschle drove out the vaccine manufacturers. Schumer is hazardous to the health of all Americans who are reliant on a steady supply of pharmaceuticals. He should be defeated.


2 posted on 10/22/2004 11:04:24 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Add in trail lawyers bringing multi-million dollar suits if anyone had an unforeseen allergic reaction and BINGO, no one in their right mind would produce the vaccine...
3 posted on 10/22/2004 11:07:04 AM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Did Kerry vote for the Vaccines for Children Act?


4 posted on 10/22/2004 11:08:51 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

the dems arw whining that the prez's medicare drug plan doesn't let the governmetn "negotiate" prices with drug companies. now we all should know why - this is the result.


5 posted on 10/22/2004 11:09:56 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Did Kerry vote for the Vaccines for Children Act?

I think he did...right before he voted against it...

6 posted on 10/22/2004 11:10:49 AM PDT by danneskjold (All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Ping


7 posted on 10/22/2004 11:12:00 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

No, blame Hillary. She is the one who pushed for this price cap program that drove flu vaccine manufacturers out of business since they were being asked to take a loss on every single vile they produced.


8 posted on 10/22/2004 11:40:28 AM PDT by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund effectively insulates vaccine manufacturers from any liability. Let's face it, they are not producing vaccines or new lines of antibiotics because there is more money in hair and erections.


9 posted on 10/22/2004 12:04:15 PM PDT by agsloss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spok
I haven't found the vote or the bill yet, but Senator Danforth predicted the havoc the bill would cause as found on page S4447 (4/2/1993) of the Congressional Record for the 103rd Congress:
Mr. DANFORTH. Mr. President, yesterday Senators Kennedy and Riegle introduced this administration's universal purchase vaccine initiative. I commend Senators Kennedy and Riegle and this administration for their commitment to preventative health and the health and well-being of our Nation's children . The need to do a better job of immunizing America's children is beyond dispute, but the solution they propose is misguided.

... Aside from being wasteful and ineffective, there are also significant concerns about the impact universal purchase would have on the quality, availability and continued innovation of childhood vaccines . At a minimum, great amounts of Government energy would have to be expended to devise a system to replace the private market here. ...
[emphasis added]
10 posted on 10/22/2004 12:10:48 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Kerry: I wholeheartedly disagree with you beyond expression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

This is EXACTLY what the Clintons had in mind.


11 posted on 10/22/2004 12:19:46 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
As I see it, we cannot rely on fickle politicians to pay attention to things like this. They are always putting their time and effort into new things that get headlines and show little interest in oversight. I saw this first hand when I spent a summer in Canada. Politicians had allowed the Ontario power grid to decay and go bankrupt while demogoging cheap power. They also failed to invest in MRI machines. I guess they wanted to spend money on limos, instead.

Likewise, one could ask how it is that British regulators let 50 million doses be made before they found contamination . That is a huge risk of being in a government regulated business--lose an entire year's work. I have never met anyone who did not complain that government inspectors know nothing about their business.

It seems to me that we have already given government more responsibility than it can handle. Let them improve the intellligence agencies before they ask for more to do.

12 posted on 10/22/2004 12:28:37 PM PDT by ClaireSolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OESY

October 22, 2004 -- AMERICA'S flu vaccine shortage has become a campaign issue, with Sen, John Kerry blaming President Bush for failing to take steps to assure a reliable supply of shots this year. That's a typical Kerry tactic: Blame the president for a problem he's been trying to solve — and which Kerry and other politicians created.
The fact is, this is the fourth year in a row we have had shortages of flu or pediatric vaccines. This year's shortage came when British health authorities closed a U.S.-owned plant that makes half our nation's flu shots. But that begs the question of why the entire United States is served by only two manufacturers of flu vaccines.

The answer is that Congress decided 10 years ago to have the government buy up most of the vaccines at fixed, below-market prices. The Vaccines for Children Program, established by the Clinton administration and a Democratic Congress in 1994, federalized much of the once-private U.S. market for vaccines — vastly expanding the government's role as price-setter and production manager. (Despite the name, it covered many shots for adults, too.)

Pitched as a way to improve development and supply, VFC wrote price controls on vaccines into federal law. Faced with government-set low prices — and with development and production costs soaring thanks to frivolous lawsuits, other new regulations and the need to invest in new technology — companies have been pulling out of the vaccine business in droves.

President Bush lifted the price caps when he came to office — but VFC also made the government the main purchaser of flu and pediatric vaccines, moving it from about 30 percent of the market to 65 percent and rising. That enormous purchasing power has allowed it to continue to command pitifully low prices for the existing stable of vaccines.

Bush has also tried to reduce development costs, to no avail. His effort to limit the liability of companies that make vaccines for the public health and fight bioterror has been thwarted by Kerry, Edwards and other leading Democrats. And the same politicians that blame the president for not getting the FDA to speed up vaccine approvals were responsible for demanding that the agency set up tougher and more expensive regulations for testing and manufacturing shots.

If your prices are set at unreasonably low prices and your costs keep rising, at some point you've got to close up shop. That's what has happened in the vaccine business. In 2001 there were four flu-vaccine makers in America; now there's only one. Twenty years ago we had 30 pediatric vaccine producers; today, only three.

As a result, we've had four straight years of flu-shot shortages as well as shortages of seven of the 11 shots that children need before age 5.

Vaccine development is risky. Many prototypes have failed, along with the start-up companies and venture capitalists that financed them. Still others are in the pipeline and require billions more in private capital for further testing. Until investors and vaccine makers have confidence that there is a private market for their products and they are protected from crazy lawsuits, the shortages will endure and new vaccine production will lag behind the science.

It is hypocritical and disingenuous for Kerry to promise he'll solve the vaccine shortage: His proposals to import all medicines from countries with price controls and to make the government the biggest buyer of all drugs would decimate all pharmaceutical development in the same way government control has destroyed the vaccine industry.

The president needs to encourage private insurance coverage of vaccines (it's a tiny share of total health-care spending in any event) and limit government purchases to public health clinics.

A great model for where to go next is the "Bioshield" bill introduced by Sens. Joe Lieberman and Judd Gregg; it would encourage the development of biodefense vaccines with stronger patent protection, less FDA regulation certifying new vaccine facilities, caps on liability and a no-price-control pledge on new products purchased by the government. Those reforms should be extended to vaccines generally.

Critics will say that vaccine production is too important to be left to market forces. The same thing could be said about all drugs. But the shortages that are the result of government-controlled vaccine purchases and pricing has taught us the exact opposite: If something is really valuable, putting a price on it will get you more of what you need.


13 posted on 10/24/2004 5:10:53 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson