Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cops’ pepper shot kills student
Boston Herald ^ | Friday, October 22, 2004 | By Tom Farmer and Dave Wedge

Posted on 10/22/2004 3:46:41 AM PDT by ninonitti

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: canalabamian
Lesson: when you see cops move in on a crowd...leave. Bad things generally happen when you are somewhere you don't belong, or when you're doing something you shouldn't be doing.

Exactly

81 posted on 10/22/2004 6:59:49 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rubber_Duckie_27
"The girl shouldn't have been in the middle of a riot. No one is to blame but her."

That is just a silly statement. If she was there and participating in the riot by choice, that's one thing, but I saw nothing in the article to indicate she was involved.

Sure, it is always the best thing when you see something like this happening to get the heck out ASAP, but in a pressing crowd, it isn't always possible. A large crowd can trun ugly very quickly. I have been in a similar situation, inadvertently I might add, and an ambulance wasn't even able to break through the mob. It took a long time to extract ourselves from the midst of the chaos and we had children with us. I guarantee you that if my child had been shot by a cop trying to break up an unruly crowd, unintentianally or not, I'd have had his job and his bank account.

82 posted on 10/22/2004 7:00:23 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
You've never owned a .22 have you? Neither has this Jeff Cooper apparently.

Did you mean to be funny? I sometimes have trouble catching the sarcasm on this board. If not, please do not take this as a personal insult, but your comment is very funny. It’s akin to saying, “You do not know much about the bench press, do you. Neither has this Arnold Schwarzenegger.”

83 posted on 10/22/2004 7:02:04 AM PDT by Stat-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
We still have a ways to go before we rival Byzantium's Blue and Green riots.

Wow. 30,000 rioters killed.

Nika riots

84 posted on 10/22/2004 7:07:04 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
I guess it's open season on young women....what kind of maroons are wielding these "non-lethal" weapons?

You are right. What we should do is declare a 24 hour period of rioting after major sports victories so that the fans can get it out of their system by destroying the city.

85 posted on 10/22/2004 7:10:30 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Assigning blame based on reading this one short news article is like taking a Rorschach test. Long-time FReepers ought to have learned by now to avoid passing rash judgments after MSM first reports.

They never learn. And they wonder how the 'sheeple' believe the Kerry lies ... Go figure.

86 posted on 10/22/2004 7:11:49 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

To bad the Federal government doesn't treat the epic invasion of our country as serious as they do unruly crowds of citizens celebrating sporting events.


87 posted on 10/22/2004 7:15:08 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
Gee, I wonder if we will have rioting when Bush wins?

I do too.

But first I think some people have to get a handle on what a riot is. We've had riots in this country -think after MLK's death in the 60's or the Rodney King verdict in the 90's and then we have things like this which are more like a brawls.

I still maintain that the cops could've cracked heads and dispersed the crowds without busting a cap-albeit a "non-lethal" one- in this kid.

88 posted on 10/22/2004 7:29:38 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Strangely, I didn't hear about anything like this happening in St. Louis overnight.

Some morons just can't handle losing OR winning. Win or lose, property must be destroyed; someone has to die.

But, this is a sports thread. What are YOU doing here? ;O)

89 posted on 10/22/2004 7:35:36 AM PDT by newgeezer (...until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

"Yes it is. The cops were surrounded by people who were beginning an honest-to-goodness riot. Do you suggest that the cops should have read 19th century French poetry to calm the crowd?"

First, it was not a riot. A mob perhaps, but not a riot. It was rowdy dunk college kids acting like fools. These were not professional anti-social protesters. Big difference

Second, what I would expect is that a professional police force would block streets off prior to the end of the game, and line cops up outside the Fenway bars so that when the kids flew out of the bars it would be impossible for them to overtake the streets or get out of control. The cops job is to maintain control, which they failed to do. But even if they were going to resort to using pepper spray guns, I would expect them to use them properly. They are not meant to be fired in a point blank fashion as the cops did.

I'm all for keeping order, but I do expect professionalism out of the police as the NYPD demonstrated on 9/11.


90 posted on 10/22/2004 7:36:00 AM PDT by The Hound Passer (Sitting home in protest this Nov is a vote for Kerry and Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

I always try to avoid riots, and make sure that I am no where in the vacinity of the riots. Especially around criminal activity- which is the entire riot. Poor girl was a part of an illegal activity. Poor girl made a poor choice to be a part of a riot. Sad choices lead to tragic results. I would have left.


91 posted on 10/22/2004 7:39:51 AM PDT by Porterville (NEED SOME WOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac
There is no way "non-lethal" weapons should result in a death. But on the other hand, cops should not have to worry about their safety because a city's team has won a ball game. Is this South American soccer? should result in a death. But on the other hand, cops should not have to worry about their safety because a city's team has won a ball game. Is this South American soccer?

The rules for use of this particular type of "non-lethal weapon" must be re-evaluated. It is still a useful "non-lethal weapon" but only in certain well defined situations.

It's "non-lethal" use is now applicable only when it is used to deliver body blows to the torso while contact with the head is clearly seen to be potentially fatal.

As such, it needs to be reserved for stand-off situations where is single individual is holding off police with a knife or other potentially lethal short range weapon. In such situations, the police must be able to target the perp's torso and nothing else.

In crowd control situations or in situation's when a perp is running through innocent bystanders, it's use is no can longer be thought of as "non-lethal".

92 posted on 10/22/2004 7:42:11 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sirc_Valence

"No, dumb libs like you are to blame. There's a term for it: enabler. Crowds are not supposed to behave this way and you should be happy that more orcs didn't perish in their chaotic and destructive "celebration"."

Sorry. You can call me anything you like, but lib just doesn't fit me. Its rather laughable if you take a look at all my other comments on other topics. I assure you my educational and conservative credentials are a lot thicker than yours.

What you don't seem to grasp is that the police had prior knowledge the mob would form. The police did little to prepare for it. In my conservative world, I'd fire an employee that didn't properly prepare. I'd make them take responsibility for there screw up. So, I'm not sure why you want to give the police a pass here. This was not some random riot. The police did not plan.

I neither give the crowd a pass, nor do I condone their behavior. But, again, it's up to the police to preserve order. If the police were prepared they would have had enough man power out there to prevent crowds spilling into the streets in the first place. It seems to me you are the enabler here of poor police work.


93 posted on 10/22/2004 7:52:16 AM PDT by The Hound Passer (Sitting home in protest this Nov is a vote for Kerry and Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer
First, it was not a riot. A mob perhaps, but not a riot. It was rowdy dunk college kids acting like fools. These were not professional anti-social protesters. Big difference

Gosh. So it's only a riot if done by trained professionals? I'd think that things burning, signs and trees being pulled down for weapons, and such would be enough for you to conclude that bad things were starting to happen. Apparently not.

The fact that it did not become a full-fledged riot is due, in large part, to the fact that the cops applied force when they did. The girl died in a freak accident -- but the judicious use of force by the cops did what it was supposed to do.

94 posted on 10/22/2004 7:59:28 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
That is just a silly statement. If she was there and participating in the riot by choice, that's one thing, but I saw nothing in the article to indicate she was involved.

From CNN: "She loved the Red Sox. She went in to celebrate with friends" (a quote from her father). Emerson College is not in Boston

Anyone who cares for their personal safety should not be going out to join a mob to celebrate a sports victory. These types of situations always seem to end with arrests and property destruction at the very least, and often end with people getting hurt or killed. As safe as it may seem, they can get very nasty very quickly.

My alma mater is major basketball powerhouse. Sure, it was exciting and fun when they won championships. That doesn't mean I joined the 10,000-person mobs who went around campus setting bonfires and throwing bottles at cops! It's simply foolish to knowingly put yourself in a situation that's likely to get out of control.
95 posted on 10/22/2004 9:14:31 AM PDT by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer
From Websters:

RIOT
2 a : public violence, tumult, or disorder b : a violent public disorder; specifically : a tumultuous disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled together and acting with a common intent.

Perhaps it was a ruckus?

General rule of thumb, stay away from drunks who are tearing up private property, especially beat feet once the cops arrive.

96 posted on 10/22/2004 9:18:57 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer
Riot: a disturbance of the peace created by an assemblage of usually three or more people acting with a common purpose and in a violent and tumultuous manner to the terror of the public; also : the crime of rioting

This should clear up the defenition of riot for you.

As for the loss of an innocent, what goes around comes around. I am quite positive the Cops had no intention of killing anyone. Sounds to me like they had no choice. What exactly do you mean by a plan? The plan was to disperse these people and send them home. If they had done that, there would have been no loss.

You sure you're not a Troll from DU? These people have no defense. Why are you trying to give them one?

97 posted on 10/22/2004 9:25:23 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (Carnivores for Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

It was a freak accident, nothing more.


98 posted on 10/22/2004 9:30:17 AM PDT by RobRoy (You only "know" what you experience. Everything else is mere belief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

"but the judicious use of force by the cops did what it was supposed to do."

So shooting an innocent in the face after coming out of a bar and get stuck in a crowd is "judicious" use of force? Would you feel the same if that was your kid or niece, or sister, or friend that got shot? If you were familiar

If you read the witness and press reports, the girl that got shot was not even in the area where the incidents you speak of occurred. What happened was that someone threw a bottle near a cop and the cop shot before he could think. Not what I expect out of a professional. Seems like a rookie move. We will seek what the police investigation reveals.

But I tell you what. Take a look at the picture here http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2004/10/21/in_victory_fan_anxiety_turns_to_delirium?pg=2 and tell me which one of these goofballs the police should shoot next. They look like quite a threat to cops in riot gear.


99 posted on 10/22/2004 9:30:37 AM PDT by The Hound Passer (Sitting home in protest this Nov is a vote for Kerry and Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer

You're not rational.


100 posted on 10/22/2004 9:35:48 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson