Replies

I am in Nevada. We almost matched the Democrats in new registrations. The difference--I'll bet almost all new Republicans will vote--while the newly registered Democrats will vote in lesser numbers. Nevada will go for Bush by 2 to 5 per cent and the vote will not be challenged because the system is solid. They can actually pull up any provisional voter's registration by computer with the signature right there on the screen. Very few provisional voters will get to vote twice, they will all be checked for fraud. The media will sit on Nevada if it is close on the electoral votes, but I know many Democrats who just can't vote for Kerry. We have a lot of "Mormoncrats" and they will vote Republican based on the moral issues.

Bush in good shape in Florida

Florida GOP and rat voter turnout in 2000 and 2002:

2002

2,828,288 56% GOP

2,172,702 43% RAT

2000

2,909,176 49 % GOP

2,907,451 49 % RAT

Approx. 750,000 less rats and 80,000 less GOP turned out (10-1) in 2002 than in 2000.

This in spite of the fact that 2002 was supposed to be "revenge" against Jeb for 2000

Kerry is not going to do any better than Gore, a lot of people that voted Gore last time are for Bush, the same can't be said for the rats.

I guess its just a coincidence, but 2002 was the first year they used those computer voting machines, doing away with those pesky chads.

Could it be that the stupid rats haven't figured out a way to cheat these machines yet, could that be a factor in the mystery of the disappearing dems?

After all, its a lot harder for a bunch of foaming at the mouth socialist morons to "lose" ballot boxes, or punch thousands of ballots after the polls have closed, to fool a computer.

Democrats engaged in massive vote fraud in Palm Beach, Broward, and Dade in 2000.

They have been trumped by the computer.

No wonder they are pissed

W should break 3,000,000.