Posted on 10/19/2004 7:50:40 PM PDT by Perdogg
*John Loftus reported tonight that Mookie Al Sadr was under house arrest by Sistani.
*Al Qaeda is planning a strike in Beruit Lebanon.
*U.S. believes that Al Qaeda sleeper cells are poised to strike in the US before Nov 2nd. However, the US is keeping their eyes on these cells.
They're planning to strike what in Beirut?
I am just reporting what I heard.
Gee Mr. Loftus... whatever happened to the WMD stuff u were talking about? Beh, don't believe this guy.
He said a shopping mall. Soft target.
That could be, there is no way we can defend them all or probably find where they would strike.
Plus, Quaddify is going to come forward & tell about all the WMD that he was hiding for Saddam in a mountain outside Tripoli.
Is Sadr's first name Mookie? Sounds like the name of a guy doing an act in the Catskills.
I would not write off the WMD. Read the CIA report. It states no WMD were found in Iraq. It does not explain what happened to Saddam's 1991 stockpile. The CIA assumes it was destroyed per UN directive but there is no third party confirmation. In some ways the CIA report is wrong to conclude that there is no WMD.
"Is Sadr's first name Mookie? Sounds like the name of a guy doing an act in the Catskills."
His first name is Muqtada but Loftus calls him Mookie.
"Al Sadr was under house arrest by Sistani"
Hmmm..........
Sadr's first name is not Mookie. I think it is Muftki, but our troops butcher its pronunciation.
In the first Gulf War, Saddam outsourced a lot of planes to Iran so they wouldn't get taken out by bombing of his airfields.
There are stories about shipping WMDs to Libya for safekeeping; also to Syria. And Iran is another possibility. Iran and Iraq are like a cat and a dog, but they cooperated in protecting Saddam's planes, and they might have done it again.
It's Muqtada, but even Iraqis have shortened it to Muqdi or Mookie.
It's Muqtada, but even Iraqis have shortened it to Muqdi or Mookie.
Funny how on the one hand, no one will talk about where the WMD is, but, at the same time, no body will spill the beans about how or where they were destroyed. How to explain this???
"Funny how on the one hand, no one will talk about where the WMD is, but, at the same time, no body will spill the beans about how or where they were destroyed. How to explain this???"
David Kay gave an interview to the Daily Telegraph in which he said that he suspected that WMD had been transferred to Syria. Duelfer also discusses that possibility. Our satellites photographed large convoys going into Iraq just before the war but no one can prove what was in them.
Maybe no one wants to discuss it right now because if they did, there would be tremendous pressure to act on it.
Sorry - correction.
"Funny how on the one hand, no one will talk about where the WMD is, but, at the same time, no body will spill the beans about how or where they were destroyed. How to explain this???"
David Kay gave an interview to the Daily Telegraph in which he said that he suspected that WMD had been transferred to Syria. Duelfer also discusses that possibility. Our satellites photographed large convoys going into SYRIA just before the war but no one can prove what was in them.
Maybe no one wants to discuss it right now because if they did, there would be tremendous pressure to act on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.