Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Oil Heading For $100? (Why has Wall Street missed it so badly?)
Forbes ^ | 10.19.04 | Dan Ackman

Posted on 10/19/2004 6:52:31 PM PDT by Truth666

NEW YORK - Yesterday, in writing about the rise in oil prices--which have roughly doubled in a year--I noted, "No one saw it coming." (See: "Oil Hits $55 Alarm; Greenspan Hits Snooze.")
As it turns out, a few people did see it. And now some of those seers are saying the recent "spike" is no spike at all, but the start of a long-term trend. It may be that the price of a barrel of oil is heading for $100, if not higher, by the end of the decade.
To be sure, the conventional wisdom is that oil prices, which fell a bit yesterday to about $53 per barrel, are going no higher and will likely fall back. That seems to be the view of Wall Street firms, most of which say as much in their research reports. Bear Stearns (nyse: BSC - news - people ), for instance, last month forecast a $25 price in 2005. Even relative "bulls" like Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ) are talking about whether prices in the high $30 range might be sustained.

That investors as a whole see the current price jump as a blip is shown by the fact that, while prices of shares in oil companies like Exxon-Mobil (nyse: XOM - news - people ) or BP (nyse: BP - news - people ), and oil services firms, like Schlumberger (nyse: SLB - news - people ) or Transocean (nyse: RIG - news - people ) have risen, they have not risen by anything like the price of the oil they drill and sell.

"To the best of my knowledge, not once [since 1998 when oil was around $11 per barrel] has any Wall Street firm forecast oil prices to be on a yearly uptrend," says Stephen Leeb, president of Leeb Capital Management, a New York investment manager and author of The Oil Factor (Warner Business 2004). Why has Wall Street missed it so badly? Leeb suggests that the answer lies not in economics, but in mass psychology, specifically studies of social conformity.

Leeb himself is forecasting higher, indeed skyrocketing, prices. He is not part of a crowd, but he is not all alone either. He is joined by, among others, Matthew Simmons, chairman of Simmons & Company International, an energy banking firm in Houston. Simmons speaks of a phenomenon called "Peak Oil" and says it is "as inevitable as death," though, like death, predicting its precise timing is not easy. Leeb and Simmons point out that, unlike the oil crisis of the late 1970s and early 1980s, which was a political phenomenon, the current price increases are fueled by supply and demand, which are less transitory than politics.

What is the scenario in which oil hits $100 per barrel in the next five or six years?

Just as the current price increases are said to be fueled in part by rising demand from China and India, those countries will also play a large role in the long term. Leeb says that China and India now consume energy (not just oil, but all forms of power) at a per capita rate that is one half the world average. Compared to the rich nations like the U.S. and Western Europe, their per capita consumption is one-seventh as large. If these two countries become wealthy, as everyone expects they will, and merely start to consume like the rest of the world (forget about their consuming like the U.S.), that rise in demand will have a dramatic impact on world energy markets.

Leeb estimates that if China and India continue to grow, the demand for oil will rise by 6.1% per year. To meet such demand, the world would have to raise output by 43% by 2010 and to triple it in 20 years.

Is such an increase plausible? Simmons points out that, while new discoveries are certainly possible, even likely, 70% of the world's daily supply comes from fields that have been drilled for 30 years or more. Leeb adds that even Saudi Arabia, despite a stagnant economy, consumes 24% of the oil it drills. In order for it to boost production, it will have to consume a higher percentage of what it makes. As for the world's second largest oil exporter, Russia, if its economy weren't a basket case, it might be using its entire output internally.

Leeb says that during the last oil crisis, the world was producing at 70% capacity. Now it's at 99%. Because there is no slack in the system, every time there is a trial in Russia, a strike in Venezuela, a hurricane off Louisiana or a surge in violence in the Middle East, the oil markets react dramatically. The good news is that we are more efficient than in the 1980s, and we spend a much smaller share of gross domestic product on energy. But while demand may slack off short term due to slower growth, the longer term is troubling regardless of new production technology or far better conservation.

Where have we heard this before? In the 1970s and 1980s, some prognosticators spoke about the world "running out of oil." That prospect is not what drives the current fears. It is the apparently inevitable supply-and-demand driven market movements that may force the price of oil to $100. And that's a lot scarier.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: energyprices; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Truth666

Let oil prices go high enough, and oil will be about as economical as whale oil is today. The higher the cost per barrel, the greater the economic incentive to find alternatives. The Arabs think they're playing a clever game, but they're going to price themselves right out of the game, eventually.


61 posted on 10/19/2004 8:50:26 PM PDT by valkyrieanne (card-carrying South Park Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

And the logical end conclusion of this will be a US that is no longer a Free Republic(it has been in decline since LBJs Great Society programs) into a European Style Social Democracy with the social unrest of a Brazil.


62 posted on 10/19/2004 8:51:48 PM PDT by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne

I don't think the arabs are playing this game now. but we will know after the election, if indeed $10-15 in speculation is quickly driven out of the price, and it gets down to $40, things will settle down.


63 posted on 10/19/2004 8:53:15 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: narses
Soros may be buying contracts, but he is just another fish in a black ocean full of sharks and parasites.

Driven by lackluster equities markets and less than a robust investment banking climate, many large institutions, banks and hedge funds are piling into the oil speculation game.

All of this new money is driving the market up, and physical hedgers are being eclipsed by the new black gold rush.

Some firms such as Morgan Stanley have even gone as far as to make preparations to actually take delivery on the contracts, renting warehouse space to store their booty. (Probably a scam to drive more fear into the market...never actually intending to take delivery).

George Soros has an estimated net worth of between 7 to 11 Billion, depending on who you believe.

United States oil consumption in 2003 was approximately 20 Million barrels of oil per day. At todays price that is 1.1 Billion dollars a day.

World oil consumption in 2001 was about 75 million barrels per day...and I am sure its higher than that today. At todays price thats about 4.125 Billion dollars a day in 2001.

George Soros in his wildest dreams couldn't skew the oil market if he tried...even if he threw 50% of his net worth at the market each day in 5% increments, he would exhaust his trading account in 10 days, and at best(worse) have only a marginal effect and a short lived one at that. Further he would be on the wrong side of the trade that heavy long if things pull back...

George Soros might be an A$$hole...but he is not an idiot.

If Bush announces renewed drilling in California, the Gulf and new drilling in ANWAR, watch oil fall like a drake mallard full of nickel #2's at 30 yards hit with a full choke.

64 posted on 10/19/2004 8:56:12 PM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity

Soros has assembled a cabal of billionaires to take out the President.


65 posted on 10/19/2004 8:58:14 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. + http://www.alamo-girl.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Jinx yourself. The president will be reelected. Whether you like it or not
66 posted on 10/19/2004 9:04:15 PM PDT by Kaslin (Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Greenspan manages quite a chunk

Greenspan doesn't manage anything except Fed monetary policy which is what he was hired to do. What are you talking about?

67 posted on 10/19/2004 9:06:36 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; TexasCowboy
$100/bbl oil before 1990

In 1981 everyone in Houston was saying $72 in 82 and then came the bust.

68 posted on 10/19/2004 9:23:45 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Whether I like it or not? Back away from the anger, compadre. I said 'jinx jinx jinx' because I didn't want the fact that you said it to make it NOT come true. Silly superstition. Not disdain for the idea of reelecting Bush, which I'm all for.
69 posted on 10/19/2004 9:27:50 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: narses
Soros has assembled a cabal of billionaires to take out the President.

Funny how he's bidding up copper, aluminium and propane as well.

70 posted on 10/19/2004 9:38:17 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

that's right - it takes a recession to break oil prices, and if this oil prices holds, that's what will happen this time.


71 posted on 10/19/2004 9:40:31 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

Propane is a related commodity. The others haven't risen the same way (overlay the charts), they represent the decline in the dollar and the robust world demand for them (that dratted strong economy).


72 posted on 10/19/2004 9:48:50 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. + http://www.alamo-girl.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin

Japan's market dropped 1% tonight on fears the Chinese economy is slowing down, according to CBS.MarketWatch.com.


73 posted on 10/19/2004 10:14:13 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The demeaning of America's morale... Why can't people see it's "an inside job?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

Especially in the case of natural gas. When liquified natural gas becomes more common it will help the supply demand situation. Drilling in ANWAR and nuclear power would have significant impacts also.


74 posted on 10/19/2004 10:27:30 PM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235; Dog Gone
"and propane as well."

That billionaire bastard better leave my propane prices the hell alone!!! Now it's gittin personal!!!

D.G., it's good to see you on this thread!

75 posted on 10/19/2004 10:30:38 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The demeaning of America's morale... Why can't people see it's "an inside job?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Yeah on that. I don't like the cost to my pocketbook, but the long term effect is renewed interest in different enery sources. However, it also makes Changing World Technologies look pretty good, too. See their page, here.
76 posted on 10/20/2004 1:58:16 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Kedwards have been on so many sides of the issues, they've created a new geometric shape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
The US dollar is experiencing 'hyper-inflation' with energy prices, and could certainly turn into another peso as a useless marker of value. Manufacturing and programming jobs are feeling. Wage deflation is happening, bigtime.

If we don't counter this, it might be $5 a gallon for gas, and the wages around $10 an hour.

This is the worst case of course, but we must be prepared for it. Outsourcing of all industries will deplete the USA of wealth. The higher gas prices are a sign.

That would only be true if oil prices are not up worldwide. Everyone is in the same boat w.r.t. the price of oil.

Also, what you say about global sourcing is nonsense. I and my shareholders are more wealthy because people in India do menial programming at $10/hr. We can make more products, and sell them in more markets worldwide, because we can get more done sooner and cheaper. If you complain about programmers in India, you should also balance that with the fact we sell those Indian programmers' work in Asia, Europe, and South America.

77 posted on 10/20/2004 5:35:45 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cmotormac44
and on and on---all pointing to the Bibical Prophecies of 'end times' and the world turmoil that will take place--God still Rules in the affairs of men!--no one has to believe but it will take place (and right on the Lords timetable)

Ask a Seventh Day Adventist how overdue the End Times are. The End Times are always scheduled to arrive within the lifespan of a sect's founder.

78 posted on 10/20/2004 5:37:25 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

No, time to just buy a VW TDI and get 50 MPH without all the extra batteries and costs.


79 posted on 10/20/2004 5:41:43 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
"If Bush announces renewed drilling in California, the Gulf and new drilling in ANWAR, watch oil fall like a drake mallard full of nickel #2's at 30 yards hit with a full choke."

...and all would be left is a ball of feathers!

80 posted on 10/20/2004 6:42:35 AM PDT by painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson