Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team Bush declares war on the New York Times
Guardian ^ | October 19, 2004 | October 19, 2004

Posted on 10/19/2004 3:00:59 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Former Military Chick; Coop; Perlstein; Mark Felton; jmstein7; William McKinley

First of all, NY Times' "reporter" Suskind stole his recent "Bush's Faith" article from Village Voice writer Rick Perlstein, who ran a strikingly similar article this Summer after interviewing several FReepers.

Second, Suskind has *already* been busted for falsely portraying CIA maps of Saudi Arabian oil fields as "proof" that GWB was after Iraq's oil...because those Saudi maps also showed Iraq on them.

Third, Suskind fabricated the quote from Bush of him supposedly saying that he was going to campaign with "his foot on Kerry's throat". Suskind wasn't even in attendance, and the NY Times has no way to support their claim that they "Fact checked" that quote because the NY Times wasn't even there. At best it's a 3rd hand source.

Fourth, the NY Times has run TWO apology stories in which it "apologized" for not being more skeptical of the world's claims of Hussein having WMD's...editorials that were transparent attempts to slam the President and perhaps trigger an undeserved apology from the White House.

...And all of this is coming from a newspaper that had to fire a reporter and two editors in this last year for outright FABRICATING stories and without fact-checking them!

81 posted on 10/19/2004 7:28:51 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I admit, I do sometimes buy a copy of the New York Times. It is a matter of economy with me though. The NYT, for its price, has more square inches of paper to cover the bottom of my bird cage than any other publication! I just hope that my parrot doesn't read that bull$hit that's down below!!!!!


82 posted on 10/19/2004 7:31:50 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

What's wrong with calling a spade a spade? The paper of Howard Raines and Jason Blair has serious problems and for the public to go on acting as if they're God Almighty is not only ludicrous and stupid, in a time of war it's suicidal.


83 posted on 10/19/2004 7:32:23 PM PDT by hershey (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomSurge
"Bush should be very careful..."

Love it.

84 posted on 10/19/2004 7:35:14 PM PDT by Radix (Lets see, Algore in 2000, Frankenstein in 2004, what is next a Beast in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
If Times readers did not already know the paper's relationship with the White House was in serious disrepair, they found out on September 18. That day, Times reporter Rick Lyman wrote a front-page piece about how, despite having been assigned by the country's most influential newspaper to cover Cheney's re-election campaign, he was not welcome on Air Force Two, where 10 seats were reserved for the travelling press corps. None was available for him, or for the previous Times reporter assigned to the Cheney beat. Lyman's article, headlined Chasing Dick Cheney, was written with a slightly tongue-in-cheek tone (as much irony as the still-staid Times allows) but could not mask the strain between the paper and the White House, the kind of rift usually kept from public view as administration and news officials exchange behind-the-scene phone calls to try to patch things up.

Rick Lyman isn't allowed on Air Force Two? Oh my, whatever's to become of us????

The tone of this article is that somehow, Americans should be concerned, worried even, that the Bush administration isn't playing footsie with the NYSlimes. Do you think there's a soul (outside of the Slimes itself and perhaps some Manhatten salons) who gives a rat's ass whether or not Rick Lyman is allowed on AF2?

85 posted on 10/19/2004 7:35:24 PM PDT by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hershey

You mean Howell Raines.


86 posted on 10/19/2004 7:39:46 PM PDT by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I loved it! And the reporter pretending that the NYT is an odd choice to declare war on must be delusional.


87 posted on 10/19/2004 7:41:55 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Whatever happened to the story this summer about how NYT leaked 'deep information' from the White House regarding the computer disc with terrorists' names etc.? Apparently, the WH wanted to give validity to their story and NYT spilled the proverbial beans, supposedly ruining further intelligence gathering.

Rush talked about it but I haven't heard more. Forgive me if I don't have details correct. Anyone?


88 posted on 10/19/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by madameguinot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

No, I don't recall reading that one at all! Was the reporter a bona fide Slimes employee? Was the name recognizable?

Prairie


89 posted on 10/19/2004 7:44:14 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (The SwiftBoat Veterans are STILL SERVING THEIR COUNTRY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: routerman

times sux mucho big time


90 posted on 10/19/2004 7:46:14 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Feeling so much calmer now I've cancelled my cable TV. Don't miss the Demopuke spin on cable news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
One night in 1880, John Swinton, a preeminent New York journalist, was the guest of honor at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton outraged his colleagues by replying:

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

"There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty four hours my occupation would be gone.

"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

"We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

(Source: Labor's Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)

John Swinton was born in Salton, Haddingtonshire, Scotland, 12 December, 1830. He received his early education from his uncle, the Reverend Robert Currie, emigrated in 1843 to Canada, and afterward to the United States, with his family, learned the printer's trade in Illinois, and practiced it for some time in New York city. He then received a course of classical instruction at Williston seminary, Massachusetts, and afterward traveled extensively through the United States. Feeling an abhorrence for slavery, he left Charleston, South Carolina, where he resided at the time, in order to take an active part in the free-state contest in Kansas. He returned to New York city in 1857, and began the study of medicine. While thus engaged he contributed articles to the " Times," afterward accepted an editorial place on that paper, and soon became managing editor. During the absences of Henry J. Raymond he had the sole control, and wrote a large number of the leading articles. He resigned the post of managing editor at the close of the war, on account of impaired health, but continued his connection with the journal as an editorial writer till the death of Mr. Raymond. Subsequently he was managing editor of the New York "Sun." He became a leader in the movement for labor-re-forms, and in 1883 severed his connection with the "Sun" in order to expound his political and social views in a weekly journal that he called "John Swinton's Paper," which he ceased to publish in 1887.

As an aside, his brother his brother, William, was born in Salton, Scotland, 23 April, 1833, was educated at Knox college, Toronto, and at Amherst, with the intention of becoming a Presbyterian minister, and in 1853 began to preach, but adopted the profession of teaching. He was professor of ancient and modern languages at the Edgeworth female seminary, Greensborough, North Carolina, in 1853-'4, and afterward went to New York city to take a professorship in Mr. Washington collegiate institute. While in the south he contributed to "Putnam's Monthly" some critical and philosophical articles, and a series of etymological studies that were afterward published under the title of "Rambles among Words : their Poetry and Wisdom" (New York, 1859; London, 1861). Having previously contributed articles to the New York "Times," he was taken on the staff of that journal in 1858, and in 1862 went to the seat of war as a correspondent. He was equipped for this work by close study of military art, and he discussed tactical movements with such freedom that in 1864 General Ambrose E. Burnside, whom he had criticized in his letters, procured an order for his exclusion from the camps of the army. He also, at a later date, incurred the displeasure of General Grant. In 1867 he traveled through the southern states and collected material for a history of the war from the military and civil leaders of the Confederacy. Returning to the office of the "Times," he resumed the work of literary criticism, in which province he had gained a reputation before he became a war-correspondent. Before abandoning journalism, he published in newspaper articles and in a pamphlet an exposure of the machinations of railroad financiers to procure subsidies. In 1869 he became professor of belles-lettres in the University of California, where he remained for five years. Subsequently he made Brooklyn, New York, his residence, devoting himself to the composition of educational works, most of which were widely adopted in public and private schools. For a series of these, which cover most of the studies pursued in schools, he received a gold medal at the Paris exposition of 1867 "for educational works of remarkable originality and value."

In 1917, Congressman Oscar Callaway inserted the following statement in the Congressional Record:

"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.

These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found that it was only necessary to purchase control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of these papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers...

This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests being served." Feb 9, 1917, vol 54, pp.2947-48

91 posted on 10/19/2004 9:12:53 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson