Posted on 10/19/2004 8:32:13 AM PDT by Fatalis
An Open Letter to Senator John F. Kerry
From Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr.
October 19, 2004
Dear Senator Kerry,
I never met my uncle Will. He was a lieutenant in the Navy during WWII. He was killed in action on his PT boat in the Pacific. For his fatal wounds, he received the Purple Heart posthumously.
The first-captain of my West Point class took a bullet through the heart while leading a South Vietnamese airborne battalion into combat. For this fatal wound, he was awarded the Purple Heart posthumously.
My senior year roommate at West Point became a tunnel rat. A booby trap explosion killed him in the tunnels of Duc Pho. The army awarded him the Purple Heart posthumously. My plebe year roommate lost an eye and became permanently crippled. For his extensive wounds, he received the Purple Heart.
My battalion commander in Viet Nam was one of the bravest men I ever knew. He went out ahead of the troops in his light observation helicopter to find and kill enemy before they had a chance to fire on his men. That's how he died. For his fatal wounds, he received the Purple Heart posthumously.
My words pale in their import compared to the terse comment of a high school classmate of mine. We played lacrosse together in Baltimore. He went to the Naval Academy and upon graduation became a marine. This past July at our annual lacrosse crab feast, I asked him what he thought of your Purple Hearts. He said, "Bob, nine of us lieutenants went over there together, and only three of us came back. All three of us who survived spent at least a month in the hospital recovering from wounds we suffered in combat."
You didn't need any recovery time from your three alleged "wounds." How does one get "wounded" and yet not need to recover from those "wounds"? With wounds comes suffering. Where was your suffering? How could you merit a Purple Heart when you weren't even a casualty? You did not earn your Purple Hearts; you wrangled them from the system through deception so you could go home early and get out of eight months of combat. That is despicable and shameless. During the democratic convention, your flagrant boastful show of your "heroism" gave the impression that you had been a man in the thick of combat, when in fact, you had been a man on the very edge of it, all the while slyly conniving your way out of it. Instead of "Reporting for duty," you should have said, "Derelict in my duty." I marvel at your pomposity, and at the astonishing facility with which you present your phony war record as fact to the American people.
Let's compare your wounds with those of a West Point classmate of mine and his men. As my classmate directed artillery fire onto suspected enemy positions, shrapnel from an enemy mortar ripped into his leg. A medivac chopper took him to the Americal Division field hospital. When he returned to his company two weeks later, many new faces met him: the lieutenant who had taken over had marched the company into a u-shaped ambush resulting in two-thirds of the men being killed or wounded. Those wounded in that battle didn't have to put themselves in for the Purple Heart, Senator Kerry.
You exhibit the characteristics of a Narcissist. Narcissus, for whom this malignant character defect is named, fell in love with his image in a pool of water. As with Narcissus, your image has become the focus of your life. This image of yourself with which you are enamored, so greedy for recognition and praise, is only two dimensional: it has breadth and width, but no depth. And while your image may appear grand and heroic on the surface, there is no substance to it. My high school marine friend and my West Point classmate, true heroes, didn't take movie cameras with them to Viet Nam, but you did-with the express purpose of recording your imaginary exploits and feeding your grandiose image of yourself.
The truth is you faked combat wounds in Viet Nam, and your actions were devious and self-serving. You were a "Purple Heart hunter," just as the Swift Boat Vets say. Narcissus was an actor, and so are you.
I don't understand how any veteran, or any member of a veteran's family, or any sane-thinking American could even consider voting for you—a man who faked Purple Hearts in wartime. A man who will fake Purple Hearts for the sake of glorifying his image has no integrity and misdefines truth as whatever enhances the power and prestige of that image. A man without depth and substance stands for anything and everything-so long as his image is glorified. Narcissists such as you cannot be trusted; and they can be very dangerous, especially when they become paranoid about protecting their image, especially when they occupy positions of great authority and consequence. The issues in this election are truthfulness and character, and you lack both.
In 1971, I became a regional coordinator for Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) for a short time. I and many other vets were very angry at our government. We had experienced horror, terror, trauma, and grief in a no-win war and couldn't see the reason for it. We felt betrayed by our government and our military leaders. You stepped in and became our spokesman.
What enabled you to rise to the leadership of VVAW? What caused us, back then, to respect a four-month mini-veteran of the war? The answer is your medals: your phony medals for valor and your three phony Purple Hearts. Your congressional testimony about the war began with your own assertions that you had received the Silver Star and three Purple Hearts. What better spokesman than an heroic, thrice-wounded veteran! Our mistake was that we all assumed you were an honest and good man. But well before your antiwar days, you had decided to trade your integrity for the spotlight, and to barter your loyalty for vain political ambitions.
Most of us in VVAW expressed our outrage with government war policies through speeches, marches, and protests. We told the truth about what we saw and did in Viet Nam and we demanded from our leaders acknowledgement and change. You usurped the leadership of VVAW under false pretenses and dragged it in the direction of Jane Fonda and collaboration with the enemy. If, God forbid, you are elected president, in what awful direction will you and your foreign-born-and-raised wife drag our country?
Your deceit is an explicit slur upon my uncle Will's Purple Heart award, and you mock all other veterans who made the supreme sacrifice or suffered genuine wounds in combat throughout our nation's history. Your rise to prominence is based upon your abominably perverse desecration of our ideals; you have trivialized and demeaned the sacred and the solemn, and no amount of fluent sophistry or braggart pretense can cover it up.
Your conduct goes far beyond dereliction of duty. You betrayed your comrades in Viet Nam; you betrayed the trust of antiwar veterans, and now your self-fabricated credentials and continued lies contaminate the political process.
Remember the professor a few years ago who lied about being a Viet Nam veteran? His college reprimanded and suspended him for foisting such an abominable sham upon a few hundred students. I ask you in closing, Senator Kerry, what punishment is fitting for a man who fabricates medals as sacrosanct as the Purple Heart, and who continues to lie about his Viet Nam service to the entire world?
Yours truly,
Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr.
Bump!
Johnson is in the 4th row, 4th from the left with a large A on his jacket.
Things are checking out on this guy. I verified VVAW representation AND West Point class status. The Coast to Coast AM thing was simply his theories about Greek art and how it related to the Bible. Not necessarily tin foil, UFO, ghostly apparition stuff that is the usual stuff on that program.
Got your dates and presidents wrong. Jimmie Carter did the fix in 1978, not Clinton in 2001. Jimmie Carter once again proved that he was the worst president of the 20th century.
Got your dates and presidents wrong. Jimmie Carter did the fix in 1978, not Clinton in 2001. Jimmie Carter once again proved that he was the worst president of the 20th century.
kabar did not address the reissue of sKerry's medals at the same time as the board of officers issued the discharge. This would have not been required if they had not been revoked by some prior DOD action--such as a DD or a BCD.
Another question I have is why Kerry's records aren't subject to FOIA. I thought other veterans' were. Can anyone shed light on this? Is there any hope this will come out pre-election?
Officers served as tunnel rats. They were chosen mostly on size and other charateristics, and rank was mainly irrelevant.
No, but in my Googling I did see that Shinseki graduated in the same class as Johnson. I didn't mention it as I didn't think it was relevant. It is interesting that he not only graduated in the same class, but was in the same company.
Purple Heart ping
Please keep this current and please try to get it out. Copy and Fax it, send it to newspapers, post it at work, whatever it takes, get it out there.
I recognize that location at West Point. Back door of Pershing Barracks which was my barracks for my middle two years there. Memories. Class of 85.
Thanks for the ping!
Sign the Swift Boat Veterans petition to get Kerry to sign the 180.
https://www.swiftvets.com/swift/petition.php
They were betrayed. Robert S. McNamara (SecDef) was the most responsible for no-win policies, but he had plenty of help in the Kennedy-Johnson ranks. Those policies stretched the war and its carnage for at least several years. In the end, the cowardice and mismanagement in the top ranks of government threw out everything that our service people worked and fought and died for.
Wow!
Wow! is exactly what I thought, too!
a quick bio link
http://www.world-mysteries.com/gw_rbjohnson.htm
BUMP!
"Ya, it is. And in all honesty, I protested against the war, But then Enlisted."
I lived throught the VietNam era too. I was at first for it as stopping communism seemed like a good thing, then against as happened to many.
Stopping international communism in 1965 was a good idea. Of course while they had tried to subvert our institutions, no communists nor communist nation had attacked the US. That meant while noble stopping communism in Southeast Asia was not strictly a US problem.
Now in the current situation, the Islamofascist like the militarists of WWII have attacked the US. So I see it as required that the US respond like in WWII not optional as in VietNam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.