Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Landlord Sued for Rejecting Stripper
Fox News/AP ^ | 10/19/04 | Fox News/AP

Posted on 10/19/2004 7:23:50 AM PDT by misterrob

Don't discriminate against strippers.

That's the message the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (search) is sending with a lawsuit against an Omaha real-estate company that refused to rent to a topless dancer.

The Richdale Group (search) had declined to lease an apartment to Charleigh Greenwood after she listed her occupation as a "dancer" at a Council Bluffs, Iowa, lounge.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: discrimination; equalopportunity; strippers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: cjshapi

Just the bare facts, ma'am.


21 posted on 10/19/2004 7:39:08 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

In my younger days I worked as a bouncer in a couple of places that had 'dancers'

I cannot remember one that wouldnt sell it or at least rent it...and I dont remember any that werent into drugs at some level...

The kinds of people 'dancers' will bring around arent going to be appreciated by law enforcement (or at least should'nt be) or any decent tenents

Property owners should have final say so in who they rent their property to...not the state
and certainly not liberals

imo


22 posted on 10/19/2004 7:39:23 AM PDT by joesnuffy (America needs a 'Big Dog' on her porch not a easily frightened, whining, Surrender Poodle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Gee, I would say that this is another example of society attempting to force it's morals on an individual who does not want to establish a business association (remember the freedom of association and freedom of religion thing?) with an individual.


23 posted on 10/19/2004 7:41:25 AM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Thank you. :)

My favorite local dancer can actually climb up her pole backwards...23 feet in the air. Amazing to see.

24 posted on 10/19/2004 7:43:10 AM PDT by TheBigB (OPEN YOUR EYES, Clark Kent! You belong with CHLOE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: viaveritasvita

Judge ye not..............


25 posted on 10/19/2004 7:43:39 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

I agree with you. When I was younger, I lived upstairs from two dancers who were roomates. LOTS of seedy guys (and girls) around. Eventually my roomate's car was broken into by one of their "customers".

A property owner should be allowed to rent(or not rent) his property as he sees fit.


26 posted on 10/19/2004 7:44:51 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Someone axe for pictures?


27 posted on 10/19/2004 7:45:32 AM PDT by nobody_knows (Mother hold the candle steady while I shave the chicken's lips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

I don't know about the Nebraska EOC, but it certainly isn't covered under the Federal Housing Act. Under that, you can't discriminate for race, color, national origin, sex, familial status, religion, and handicap.

As a former property manager, we rented to several "dancers", and they were always quiet and paid their rent on time. I'd rent to them any time.


28 posted on 10/19/2004 7:46:25 AM PDT by jbarkley (America's light doesn't flicker, Senator Edwards, some people just close their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Another example of people making a moral judgement where they have no business doing so.

Another example of the government deciding what someone may or may not do with his own property.

29 posted on 10/19/2004 7:47:55 AM PDT by Skooz (Any nation that would elect John Kerry as it's president has forfeited it's right to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Don't discriminate against strippers.

The word 'discriminate' is interesting. In its broadest sense it simply means to recoginze the difference between two things. If you have discriminating taste in wine it really means you know one wine from another. This is as opposed to, for example, me who can only discriminate between sweet and sour wines.

Of course, if you can discriminate differences, you are also likely to make judgements about which you prefer. Again, when applied to a wine taster, they can usually be relied upon to help distinguish good wines from bad wines. This implies that there is a more-or-less generally acceptable standard of good and bad wines. That's not always perfectly clear, but it is still generally useful to accept the advice of someone who has discriminating tastes.

We started using it in a more narrow sense to judge people unfairly. Unfortunately, that takes away the opportunity to discriminate against people fairly, which is legal and reasonable. It can also be a moral obligation. For example, you probably have a moral obligation not to rent to a drug dealer for the sake of your other tenants. Discriminating against drug dealers is perfectly OK.

You should not, however, discriminate against characteristics which do not guarantee an actual difference. The color of skin or nationality of origin are examples of this kind of discrimination and the only valid use of the word as a pejorative. Why? Because skin color or nationality of origin do not necessarily indicate behaviors, and it behaviors which should cause us to discriminate.

This brings us to the stripper. Being a stripper is not a characteristic, it's a behavior. It's also more than a job. It's a lifestyle choice. As such, I believe it is reasonable for a landlord to choose not to rent to one. It is also reasonable for a landlord to cater to strippers. It's his/her property, so it's his/her choice. As long as that choice is based on behaviors and not on characteristics that don't determine behaviors.

Shalom.

30 posted on 10/19/2004 7:48:12 AM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Another example of people making a moral judgement where they have no business doing so.

I agree ... the "Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission" has absolutely no business making moral judgements against The Richdale Group or its management.

31 posted on 10/19/2004 7:48:24 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

I'd also agree that landlords should be able to rent to whomever they want. I worked in a very rough complex and the wanton destruction by some of the tenants was ridiculous. We had one lady try to get rid of her Christmas tree by shredding it in the garbage disposal, and since she was a Section 8 renter, the state made us pay for the new disposal and she got to withhold her rent until it was fixed.


32 posted on 10/19/2004 7:49:52 AM PDT by jbarkley (America's light doesn't flicker, Senator Edwards, some people just close their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley
It is my understanding that in New York City apartment boards often reject people form living in a building because of their occupation. Actors and the like are often turned down. As I recall Richard Nixon was refused at one point after his term in office. Granted that's a different state but as you stated I thought that only the specific areas you mentioned were grounds for discrimination.
33 posted on 10/19/2004 7:56:13 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Another example of people making a moral judgement where they have no business doing so.

Actually its more proof of the government forcing folks to not be able to make moral judgements in areas they should be completely allowed to do so.

Landlord owns a piece of property, its theirs, not the governments... how does the government have the right to say who that landlord must allow to live there? I know what the laws are, but seriously think about it... by what right does the government grab the power to order a private individual that they must ignore their moral, personal and at times even religious beliefs and allow their personal property to be used?

34 posted on 10/19/2004 7:57:59 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArGee

I think that most of the people here missed the point of the thread.....

:-)


35 posted on 10/19/2004 7:58:21 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
That's what's covered under Federal Law. I had to go to about 5 seminars regarding FHA laws and occupation is not one of the factors. I just looked at the Nebraska Fair Housing Laws... Nebraska Fair Housing Act Laws & Regulations Discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability or familial status is prohibited in Nebraska. Covered entities generally include residential property owners, property managers, realtors and multiple listing services. However, exemptions exist for dwellings owned or operated by religious organization and bona fide private clubs for non-commercial purposes, housing for older persons, and owner-occupied private homes in which no more than three sleeping rooms are rented.

Looks like Nebraska covers the same things as the Federal Law. Occupation is not on the list.

36 posted on 10/19/2004 8:01:29 AM PDT by jbarkley (America's light doesn't flicker, Senator Edwards, some people just close their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Another example of the government deciding what someone may or may not do with his own property.

We have a house that we rent out. I've had people call me and ask if their 6 kids would "fit" in the 3 bdrm and if they could fit a mattress into the laundry room. As a landlord, I am not permitted to say that I do want 8 people living in that home. I dread the times we have to select a renter, and when it comes around, I say very little to anyone. I accept applications and I never tell people how many apps I am processing at any given moment.
37 posted on 10/19/2004 8:01:49 AM PDT by Julie(LCR) (democrats thrive when good people sit back and do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LeftCoastRebel

We were allowed to limit the number of renters to "2 heartbeats per bedroom". You are allowed to set standards for occupation limits, but they have to be across the board. Where the familial status comes into play is saying "no kids".


38 posted on 10/19/2004 8:04:11 AM PDT by jbarkley (America's light doesn't flicker, Senator Edwards, some people just close their eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nobody_knows
We could ask that you be banned for such an atrocity.

Send that stuff to Al Qaeda, not to Free Republic.

;)

Shalom.

39 posted on 10/19/2004 8:04:32 AM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
I wouldn't want to rent to a stripper either. In comparing occupations, they have among women an exceptionally high crime rate, notably in homicide and drugs.

Painters have a very high rate of alcoholism and drug abuse. Would you want to rent to a painter?

I have rented to strippers in the past and have had few problems.

40 posted on 10/19/2004 8:14:12 AM PDT by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson