Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REAGAN DAUGHTER DECLARES WAR ON SALVATION ARMY
New York Post ^ | 10/19/04 | DAREH GREGORIAN

Posted on 10/19/2004 12:07:13 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
Are you confusing Donald Regan with Ronald Reagan?

Don't be silly Donald Reagan was never president.

21 posted on 10/19/2004 3:36:56 AM PDT by bad company (Global test? Damn I forgot to study.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill; TheTwelvePack

The truble with mispelers is they don't no they are mispelers.


22 posted on 10/19/2004 3:40:23 AM PDT by Dustoff45 (Voting for SpellCheck online for Freepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dustoff45
I'm a poor slepping confused forgetful dylsexic...I can't work out why I am on this thread...Is this the dylsexic anonymouse sight ? What time is it ?

Dylsexics of the World Untie !!!
23 posted on 10/19/2004 3:47:17 AM PDT by Bandaneira (Secetary of the Dylsexic Tryanything Freepers Club...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheTwelvePack
Regan was the best president the world has ever seen. But WTF happened with his kids? Did Nancy drop them?!

Short answer, they grew up in California.

24 posted on 10/19/2004 3:57:57 AM PDT by bullseye1911 (Natural Selection = the weak and stupid die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: dasboot

I am not sure where your information came from, but there is no way any Officer (Captain, Major, etc) in The Salvation Army has ever made $100,000 a year. I am a Captain and my yearly salary is just over $25,000.


26 posted on 11/10/2004 5:39:55 PM PST by joybellsinnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I am relieved that president Reagan does not have to endure this.

What creeps these two are.
27 posted on 11/10/2004 5:44:33 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Patti DAVIS (so glad she didn't want to take her father's good name) can bitch all she wants about the Salvation Army. All her bitching will do is fill their coffers even more! I can't wait to make a donation to them in HER name!
28 posted on 11/10/2004 5:48:31 PM PST by demkicker (I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTwelvePack
But WTF happened with his kids? Did Nancy drop them?!

From what I've heard she basically neglected them. It was all about Ronnie.

29 posted on 11/10/2004 5:50:54 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joybellsinnj

Interesting. One or the other of them may have had reasons
for misrepresenting the truth. I'll talk to auntie and see if she remembers. I apologize, if I have spoken in error.


30 posted on 11/10/2004 5:51:37 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The real question is why the Salvation Army thought paying $15,000 to hear Patti Davis speak was a good idea to begin with.

That pays for a lot of other needs if'n you ask me.


31 posted on 11/10/2004 5:54:34 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Let's REALLY Split The Country! (http://righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joybellsinnj

Thank you for clearing that up!

God bless the Salvation Army!


32 posted on 11/10/2004 5:54:34 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: joybellsinnj

Why would the Salvation Army pay people to speak. I understand paying expenses, but don't these people do these charity things for free, because you know, IT'S A CHARITY?????


33 posted on 11/10/2004 5:57:12 PM PST by Hildy (The really great men are always simple and true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Does anyone know of some good charities? AMVETS? Some neighborhs are thinking of donating some valuable antiques.


34 posted on 11/10/2004 5:58:06 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bandaneira
Dylsexics of the World Untie !!!

KO!

35 posted on 11/10/2004 6:00:29 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kattracks


Is she trying to be as obnoxious as her ballerina brother?
Thanksfully, she goes by the surname Davis.


36 posted on 11/10/2004 6:00:46 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Where did Ronnie go? Anyone seem or heard from him lately? Hey Ronnie, what's wrong? The Dems aren't ringing your phone anymore? The Demns not taking your calls now? Poor Poor Ronnie......


37 posted on 11/10/2004 6:01:25 PM PST by Two-Bits (God Bless America and those that love her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Is $25,000 a year that problematic to you???

I highly doubt folks contributing to the Salvation Army mind helping to put food on these Christian workers' tables.


38 posted on 11/10/2004 6:02:12 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
Does anyone know of some good charities? AMVETS? Some neighbors are thinking of donating some valuable antiquesBoth Goodwill and the Salvation Army are good charities. Both sell donated goods to fund their programs. The Salvation Army tends to help the poor while Goodwill concentrates on helping the disabled/disadvantaged find work and become productive.

For a charity that spends more than 100% of what you give, try the Rotary Foundation of Rotary International. They invest their donations for three years and use the profits on the investments to pay for the overhead.

39 posted on 11/10/2004 6:09:12 PM PST by centexan (Go 1st Cav - stay safe and come home soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Someone who would sue a charitable organisation because they cancelled a speaking engagement is contemptible.

Someone who would charge a charity for a speaking engagement in the first place is worse.


40 posted on 11/10/2004 6:13:22 PM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson