Speaking for myself, I can definetly love a woman who's been trained to be a pervert. (In fact I do, and I'm still training her!)
I was not trained to be a pervert.
I am self-taught.
Like hell. I can't take anything he says seriously after making this statement.
Alot of good points....and I'm a woman.
O'Reilly is no conservative. Never has been. Irrespective of this stuff, never will be. WND of all places should know this.
I think that he is spot on. Excellent article.
Who needs training? I call it testosterone poisoning.
What I don't get is the incongruency of women.
One one hand they have more now than they ever have - they are open to explore different careers, they can make a lot of money, etc. They have proven that they are just as tough as any man in the work environment.
Yet, some of those same women seem to wilt if the conversation becomes off-color, or boorish. In times like this they revert to a 16th century 'delicate flower' posture - 'offended' by an off the cuff remark so much as to find the entire environement somewhat 'hostile' to them.
It's ironic that I think the average woman of the 1840s and 1950s, for example, appears to have been a whole lot tougher in matters like this. If a man began acting significantly less than a gentleman, a woman would quickly put him in place with a slap, and otherwise tell him that if he kept it up her brothers, boyfrined, or husband would come by and kick the crap out of him. Seems to me the pre-feminist woman handled these things a lot better.
You've come a long way, baby - wilting at the mention of a pee pee, pubic hair on a soda bottle, or heaven forbid, "I would have had a lot of fun with you two back in college!"
Personally, there is BS on both sides of the bed. Harassment and Greed are the bed fellows today. There are decent men and women as well; but everyone knows how to deal with this stuff by now and it is painful to have to keep reading about it. I doubt if there are any innocents on either side of this case. It is a matter of money and how much the lawyer can make.
Ping.
There is this old fashioned concept called SELF CONTROL. No one is putting a gun to the head of any man to watch TV shows or drool after a woman.
Didn't he defend Wacko Jacko against charges of child molestation, and doesn't he (at least pretend) to think that Wacko Jacko is just a regular guy?
While this rabbi makes good points in his article, he also has "stars in his eyes." When he sees a celeb, he forgets all his good points.
The wild thing is that the guy with the see-through colleague can't prosecute HER for harrassment.....or he's thought to be gay.
In reality, women will always be marginalized, unless they dress so asexually that men never think of them that way. But then they will thought of as not quite human either.
But then again, they always get custody.
When I look at the images coming out of Hollywood, I feel sad. It's sad that we can't aspire to something better. Our society has become very crude and crass.
We have a gal at work who is ..well unpolished. I like her and all, but she is rather crude.
That doesnt bother me. Hell Im an old salior.
What does bother me is that a good man that works for us was tagged by her for sexual harrasment.
He was only playing to her lead on jokes and was not trying to get "IN" with her. Hell He is 2 years from retirement and married