dyed-in-the-wool southern Democrat
Um...ahem...WHAT planet have these people been living on for the last 31 years???
Note that George Tiller (whose last name rhymns with "Killer") performs extremely late term abortions.
I wish I could post all the article.
Email the editor for permission or get them to post the article on the website:
http://www.ncregister.com/
Finally, note that Douglas Johnson is with National Right to Life (NRTL) as the Legislative Director.
Not sure if this is Front Page News, but when there is an article about Democrats leaving Kerry in Mass Numbers, I think it is worthy.
Abortion is a good reason not to bote for Kerry, but lets not foeget he turned on his fellow soldiers, he spoent 19 years in the Senate without sponsoring any major legislation , he supports communists, , he lies through his teeth, he has an ugly wife and I havent seen his dog but I bet its ugly too.
Suppose the law was that abortion was legal only for liberals.
What would that mean to the electoral demographics in a generation or so?
How is that different than what's happening now?
Will the libs ever figure it out?
Lets welcome Larry to the party. The only party who will stand up and protect ALL life. Not just the ones outside the womb.
It's against parental notification of minors getting abortions.
None of this protects life and none of this strengthens families.
Kerry basically accused fathers of raping and impregnating their daughters. I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP!! GO BACK AND REWATCH THE 2nd Presidential DEBATE IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME!!
My friend is a Assembly of God, evangical who has always voted RAT, she is in a ditther because of the homosexual marriage issue, not the abortion issue.
When I asked her if Jesus would vote for sKerry, she sheepishly said NO.
It's sad but abortion rights are like the Holy Grail to the Democratic Party. Those who seek to advance to the higher echelons of power within that organization need not apply if they don't support unlimited choice.
There is no way one can claim to be a Catholic and support, fund, or in anyway actively support abortion, or support abortion by pretending to be "neutral".
There is no neutral position on this matter. Catholicism teaches life begins at Conception... "In your mothers womb I knew they, I knitted the". It is not gray, it is black and white. It also teaches that life is a sacred and precious gift from God. There is no middle ground, no neutrality here. Abortion in Catholicism is MURDER, period, no if ands or buts.
Supporting it, or refusing to work to end it by play the "pass" card, are not acceptable. THere is no difference in Catholicism between abortion and murdering a person of any age post birth. To argue, "I wouldn't do it, but I won't legislate that others can't" is hogwash in the Catholic faith... that is the same saying "I wouldn't murder a 22 year old, but I wouldn't legislate that others can't".
There is absolutely NO WAY one can defend or respect or acknolege the pro murder position of abortion and claim that they are Catholic, it is impossible. Sorry, Mr. Kerry, there are no nuances here.
Kerry lied about his vote during the second debate, he said it did not include an exception for the life of the mother. This is a favorite 'rat lie, on CBS radio news they said the same thing about Clinton's veto
of the ban on infantide (Patrick Moynhan's description).
About time. No wonder Democrats want to muzzle the Church.
right to Life Ping
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Discussion Ping List.
Should turn off Christian hispanics and blacks, too. Should turn off all Christians.
dyed-in-the-wool southern Democrat
Um...ahem...WHAT planet have these people been living on for the last 31 years???
John Kerry promotes "a woman's right to choose," to kill her baby in the womb.
John Kerry opposes "a woman's right to choose," to carry a gun to defend herself.
Is it just me, or is there something wrong here?
The Democrats are not unified in their support for John Kerry. It seems the Dems are torn too.
A national party no more, Zell Miller.
Great post, thanks!
I’ve been kicking around and idea…that pro abortion side augers that a women has the right to end a pregnancy and any time because…it her body that chose to ignored there killing another human being in the process… and the reality they do not want the reasonability of a child…
…. The pro life side contends that because is a another human being the women has no right to end a pregnancy unless it’s a thread to her life
What if a compromise was proposed… that women may end a pregnancy at any time (I.E. a woman may have a child removed from her body at any time) However the child MAY NOT be deliberately killed …. The child may only remove intact and given a chance at viability/ life… this would mean c session or true induced labor birth (not partial birth or saline induced labor to kill the child…..
I am pro life because I do not believe you have the right to kill another… but we are not winning…. The realty is the other side is using the “right to control your own body” argument to cover “killing for convenience” reality
Let’s split the pro abortion side argument to expose the “killing for convenience” reality