[Chemist_Geek]

You're making the assumption that such an expansion is inevitable. It's not, despite historical evidence. If you're going to argue against national I.D. based on the slippery slope fallacy, then you're going to have to prove that such provisions are going to be put into effect.

[monday]

"You're making the assumption that such an expansion is inevitable. It's not, despite historical evidence. "

lol.....What evidence would be good enough to convince you then? If thousands of years of governmental abuse of power is not enough to convince you, nothing is. You destiny is government servitude. baaa...baaaa

[steve-b]

You're making the assumption that such an expansion is inevitable. It's not, despite historical evidence.

If you're going to argue positions that fly in the face of the available evidence, you might try a forum where rational study of the facts is held in lower regard.