To: Chemist_Geek
You're making the assumption that such an expansion is inevitable. It's not, despite historical evidence. If you're going to argue positions that fly in the face of the available evidence, you might try a forum where rational study of the facts is held in lower regard.
92 posted on
10/19/2004 12:00:47 PM PDT by
steve-b
(I put sentences together suspiciously well for a righty blogger.)
To: steve-b
Your homework is to read up on
slippery slope fallacy and come back with a logical, cogent argument against federal I.D. which
isn't predicated on what some hypothetical future Administration
might do.
130 posted on
10/20/2004 6:57:20 AM PDT by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson