Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Supreme Court Rejects Democrats' Vote Fraud Scheme (Take that you thieving libs)
NewsMax ^ | October 18, 2004 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 10/18/2004 10:31:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

A voter who casts a provisional ballot - or ballots - at the wrong precinct(s) is not entitled to have the bogus vote(s) counted, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously ruled today in a blow to Democrats.

Unlike the Clinton-appointed federal judge in Ohio who last week gave election thieves a major victory by ruling for bogus provisional ballots, Florida's Democrat justices had the decency to rule against their own party's activists.

"The court said that the law clearly states that provisional ballots must be counted only if the person was entitled to vote 'at the precinct,' and that the constitution gives the Legislature the authority to dictate voting rules," the Associated Press reported.

In a slap at increasingly violent labor unions and other Democrat pressure groups, the justices pointed out that requiring provisional voters to use the correct precinct was just as reasonable as requiring everyone else to use the correct precinct.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2004 10:31:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One for the good guys


2 posted on 10/18/2004 10:33:10 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Control the information to society and you control society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Boy , I guess the SCOTUS slapped them down pretty hard in 2000, they are scared to enforce their wills FL.


3 posted on 10/18/2004 10:33:46 AM PDT by weshess (Vegetarian is an Indian word for lousy hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Boy , I guess the SCOTUS slapped them down pretty hard in 2000, they are scared to enforce their wills FL.


4 posted on 10/18/2004 10:34:04 AM PDT by weshess (Vegetarian is an Indian word for lousy hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weshess

They must have learned their lessons


5 posted on 10/18/2004 10:35:10 AM PDT by Kaslin (Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Unlike the Clinton-appointed federal judge in Ohio who last week gave election thieves a major victory by ruling for bogus provisional ballots, Florida's Democrat justices had the decency to rule against their own party's activists.

I think the Ohio ruling should be appealed. It would be especially ironic if SCOTUS cited the reasoning of SCOFLA.

6 posted on 10/18/2004 10:35:19 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I agree and I hope it will be


7 posted on 10/18/2004 10:36:54 AM PDT by Kaslin (Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I was under the impression it has been appealed. Does anyone know the status in Ohio?
8 posted on 10/18/2004 10:38:11 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A voter who casts a provisional ballot - or ballots - at the wrong precinct(s) is not entitled to have the bogus vote(s) counted, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously ruled today in a blow to Democrats.

WTF? Floriduh Supreme Court?

9 posted on 10/18/2004 10:40:31 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Dear, Ohio....

TAKE A FRIG'N MEMO!

10 posted on 10/18/2004 10:43:09 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Voter intimidation! Disenfranchisement! Bushitler's jackbooted rethugs are supressing the vote of poor underpriveledged female African-American shut-ins on the grounds of a silly technicality!

/lib response


11 posted on 10/18/2004 10:48:26 AM PDT by Another-MA-Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

check post# 3 (4) and 5


12 posted on 10/18/2004 10:50:21 AM PDT by Kaslin (Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; JIM O
I agree and I hope it will be

Considering the FL and OH are in different cicuits, I wonder if DemocRAT acrivists in FL are dumb enough to create a test case to go to the SCOTUS.

13 posted on 10/18/2004 10:51:49 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

An appeal from a state court goes directly from the state's supreme court to the United States Supreme Court. It does not go through a federal district (trial) court or a federal circuit (appeals) court.


14 posted on 10/18/2004 10:54:49 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does anyone know how the composition of the Florida Supreme Court has changed since 2000?


15 posted on 10/18/2004 10:55:25 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JIM O
I was under the impression it has been appealed. Does anyone know the status in Ohio?

It has been appealed - I believe to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

16 posted on 10/18/2004 10:59:31 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
"Does anyone know how the composition of the Florida Supreme Court has changed since 2000?"

The 2000 members are on The 9th Circuit now.

(lots of sarcasm/)

17 posted on 10/18/2004 11:50:07 AM PDT by TYVets (First and Last rule when interpreting a Poll, who paid for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Looks like they may have actually learned something about following the law after their 2000 SCOTUS slap-down.


18 posted on 10/18/2004 11:51:27 AM PDT by ShandaLear (Vote Kerry! He knows what you've got and just who to give it to!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Anyone else smell an appeal here...knowing the RATS, they could make a case that uses OH to overturn the FL decision rather than OH using FL to reverse the other Court's decision.

You gotta try to think like them to understand their skeweed logic. I have a migraine....


19 posted on 10/18/2004 11:56:40 AM PDT by southernbuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weshess

Yeah, they don't want the reputation of the 9th circuit.


20 posted on 10/18/2004 12:27:48 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experiments are the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson