Skip to comments.
Florida Supreme Court Rejects Democrats' Vote Fraud Scheme (Take that you thieving libs)
NewsMax ^
| October 18, 2004
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 10/18/2004 10:31:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
10/18/2004 10:31:01 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
2
posted on
10/18/2004 10:33:10 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Control the information to society and you control society.)
To: Kaslin
Boy , I guess the SCOTUS slapped them down pretty hard in 2000, they are scared to enforce their wills FL.
3
posted on
10/18/2004 10:33:46 AM PDT
by
weshess
(Vegetarian is an Indian word for lousy hunter)
To: Kaslin
Boy , I guess the SCOTUS slapped them down pretty hard in 2000, they are scared to enforce their wills FL.
4
posted on
10/18/2004 10:34:04 AM PDT
by
weshess
(Vegetarian is an Indian word for lousy hunter)
To: weshess
They must have learned their lessons
5
posted on
10/18/2004 10:35:10 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
To: Kaslin
Unlike the Clinton-appointed federal judge in Ohio who last week gave election thieves a major victory by ruling for bogus provisional ballots, Florida's Democrat justices had the decency to rule against their own party's activists. I think the Ohio ruling should be appealed. It would be especially ironic if SCOTUS cited the reasoning of SCOFLA.
6
posted on
10/18/2004 10:35:19 AM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
To: Paleo Conservative
I agree and I hope it will be
7
posted on
10/18/2004 10:36:54 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
To: Paleo Conservative
I was under the impression it has been appealed. Does anyone know the status in Ohio?
8
posted on
10/18/2004 10:38:11 AM PDT
by
JIM O
To: Kaslin
A voter who casts a provisional ballot - or ballots - at the wrong precinct(s) is not entitled to have the bogus vote(s) counted, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously ruled today in a blow to Democrats. WTF? Floriduh Supreme Court?
9
posted on
10/18/2004 10:40:31 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: EQAndyBuzz
Dear, Ohio....
TAKE A FRIG'N MEMO!
10
posted on
10/18/2004 10:43:09 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Kaslin
Voter intimidation! Disenfranchisement! Bushitler's jackbooted rethugs are supressing the vote of poor underpriveledged female African-American shut-ins on the grounds of a silly technicality!
/lib response
To: Paleo Conservative
12
posted on
10/18/2004 10:50:21 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Stick a fork in Kerry, he is done)
To: Kaslin; JIM O
I agree and I hope it will be Considering the FL and OH are in different cicuits, I wonder if DemocRAT acrivists in FL are dumb enough to create a test case to go to the SCOTUS.
13
posted on
10/18/2004 10:51:49 AM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
To: Paleo Conservative
An appeal from a state court goes directly from the state's supreme court to the United States Supreme Court. It does not go through a federal district (trial) court or a federal circuit (appeals) court.
14
posted on
10/18/2004 10:54:49 AM PDT
by
Iwo Jima
To: Kaslin
Does anyone know how the composition of the Florida Supreme Court has changed since 2000?
15
posted on
10/18/2004 10:55:25 AM PDT
by
Iwo Jima
To: JIM O
I was under the impression it has been appealed. Does anyone know the status in Ohio?It has been appealed - I believe to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
To: Iwo Jima
"Does anyone know how the composition of the Florida Supreme Court has changed since 2000?"
The 2000 members are on The 9th Circuit now.
(lots of sarcasm/)
17
posted on
10/18/2004 11:50:07 AM PDT
by
TYVets
(First and Last rule when interpreting a Poll, who paid for it?)
To: Kaslin
Looks like they may have actually learned something about following the law after their 2000 SCOTUS slap-down.
18
posted on
10/18/2004 11:51:27 AM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(Vote Kerry! He knows what you've got and just who to give it to!)
To: EQAndyBuzz
Anyone else smell an appeal here...knowing the RATS, they could make a case that uses OH to overturn the FL decision rather than OH using FL to reverse the other Court's decision.
You gotta try to think like them to understand their skeweed logic. I have a migraine....
To: weshess
Yeah, they don't want the reputation of the 9th circuit.
20
posted on
10/18/2004 12:27:48 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experiments are the opiate of elitist snobs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson