[Mach9]

Wouldn't count on Bush winning Weekly Reader.

[Recovering_Democrat]

This year could be dismissed, though, I'm sad to say. The rabid anti-American electorate motivated in 2004 cares VERY LITTLE for the children of the nation. And, like I say, they're rabid. Their points of view, because they are so anti-American, would not be reflected in children's votes--so I can envision a vote where the kids ACCURATELY reflect the majority of parents, but the anti-American and fraudulent votes outnumber them.

The solution is to pray and work for President Bush. Only 16 days left.

[CaptRon]

So we'll find out who gets the all-important 7-year old vote!

[MissyMa]

My son says the majority of the boys in his class favor Bush and the girls Kerry, go figure.

It doesn't help when you have a teacher who tells the kids that Bush's No Child Left Behind policy has failed and they are now forced to buy their own school supplies because of the presiden'ts cuts. I kid you not. He told me this over the weekend. She makes similar remarks once or twice a week. She was trying to call Kerry and war hero. My son told her war heroes don't come back and turn on their country.

Teachers shouldn't have this type of control IMO. This is why I think the Weekly Reader poll will show teachers bias.

[thirdgradeteacher]

My students voted for Bush too.

Bush 16
Kerry 5

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

The on-line poll is different from the one conducted in the classrooms. The liberlas attacking the on-line poll does not penetrate family conversations.

Let's wait and see what the kids have to say. After all, they tend to reflect what they hear from their parents around the dinner table - that's why it has always been such an accurate predictor.