A blast from the past...
Q: Michael Gordon, New York Times: "...Given that we're talking about matters of war and peace, does the administration plan to make a further report and provide intelligence information to address these concerns stated by the IAEA in its public report, and to buttress its claims that Iraq has resumed the production of weapons of mass destruction? And if not, is this because of targeting concerns, sources and methods, or do you simply not have reliable information that would stand up in a public forum on this?
Wolfowitz: I think the short answer, Michael, really is there is a lot of evidence; as the evidence accumulates, our ability to talk about it undoubtedly will grow. But we don't have a lot of time; time is running out, and I repeat: What has clearly not happened is any change of attitude by the Iraqi regime.
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t01232003_t0123cfr.html
______________________________
"as the evidence accumulates, our ability to talk about it undoubtedly will grow"
""There is no Saddam-terrorist connection!" The libs have said it so many darn times, we'll have to stuff the report down their throats....printing in progress!"
Let's move the goal posts. It wasn't Terrorists Saddam was connected to. We knew that all along. It was Al Queida that we were mentioning specifically.