Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unit That Refused Iraq Duty Said Released
AP ^ | 10/16/04 | REBECCA YONKER

Posted on 10/16/2004 4:41:52 PM PDT by TexKat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-456 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2004 4:41:52 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexKat

In the mean time Fox reported that the mission they refused was carried out uneventfully by another unit. They didn't come under any fire, and did not have an armed escort.

This does not look well for those kids, and the whiny call from that twerp to here mother asking for mom to raise hell was just another reason women do not belong in the military.

(donning flame proof suit...)


2 posted on 10/16/2004 4:45:19 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

I am a woman, and I agree. No flaming from me.


3 posted on 10/16/2004 4:46:55 PM PDT by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Couldn't help thinking the same thing myself when I heard it. Imagine, calling home and whining to mom from a war zone. What hath Belle wrought?


4 posted on 10/16/2004 4:47:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Hey, reduction in rank is better than dead.

The army probably will, and should, discipline the enlisted men involved. You can't allow a mutiny to go unanswered.

Then they should quietly go after the officers who were going to send them into ambush alley unescorted. Maybe they should be ordered to escort the convoys themselves, and they will learn a new appreciation for armed escort.


5 posted on 10/16/2004 4:47:26 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Quote: "Then they should quietly go after the officers who were going to send them into ambush alley unescorted."

Maybe you missed the report on Fox that another unit did the mission for them that same day, without escort, and did not report ANY contact with enemy.

It would seem the commanders know thing or two more than the reservists.


6 posted on 10/16/2004 4:50:53 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: konaice
No beef from me......I totally agree with you.

Guess the little brat will be writing a book about the nasty Army.

ps, my husband was a Master Sergeant in the Army Reserve.

7 posted on 10/16/2004 4:52:10 PM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

No flames.

Good report - thanks.

Wimmim! Stay home, until they come to your door.

Then waste'em.


8 posted on 10/16/2004 4:52:52 PM PDT by lodwick (He that meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Well, I'm not going to flame you but I know a woman in the marines who is doing a wonderful job. There are many. I'm not comfortable with women in combat, though, but even there I'm sure there are many who excel.


9 posted on 10/16/2004 4:53:41 PM PDT by valleygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

Or from me.


10 posted on 10/16/2004 4:53:56 PM PDT by Let's Roll (For a guy who shirks his own job, Kerry sure is eager to tell others what they should do ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: konaice
In the mean time Fox reported that the mission they refused was carried out uneventfully by another unit. They didn't come under any fire, and did not have an armed escort....

"Ya, know, back in Dubya-Dubya Two, when you went on a "suicide mission", you were expected to get killed!!!"


11 posted on 10/16/2004 4:55:01 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

they don't make men like they used to.


12 posted on 10/16/2004 4:55:55 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

BTW, I re-read the article. Where is a woman mentioned, other than some guy's wife? Did I miss it? Not being sarcastic, just wondered.


13 posted on 10/16/2004 4:56:01 PM PDT by valleygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
"A commanding general has since ordered the 343rd to undergo a "safety-maintenance stand down," during which it will conduct no further missions as the unit's vehicles are inspected, the military said. "

Seems to me somebody believed the troops about the potential risks. We can guess a couple of newly arrived Captains may end up reassigned somewhere else. The enlisted personnel will probably not be punished further although non-judicial punishment will remind them that there are channels of command to be followed FIRST next time this happens.

Last thing any decent General is ever going to do is encourage the EM to stay shut-up about maintenance failures.

14 posted on 10/16/2004 4:58:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
The fuel was tainted?

RIGHT ... and we all know that the kids who make up transport companies (i.e. "didn't exactly ace the ASVAB's) are all experts on chemistry and aircraft fuels.

Of course I don't have all the facts, but they sound like cowards plain and simple.
15 posted on 10/16/2004 5:00:08 PM PDT by Gerasimov (http://www.ohioforbush.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Whatever happened to another unit is not the point. As it turned out they didn't encounter any security problems. On the other hand, if they had, what would have been the result?

The real issue here is why there were officers who thought it was OK to deviate from established procedures with faulty vehicles.

16 posted on 10/16/2004 5:00:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Maybe. I saw that. What isn't clear to me is how long the guardsmen involved have been in the war zone, to be able to judge how well they knew what they were talking about.

The tension between officers and enlisted men is not new, and low level near-mutinies are not unusual, its how enlisted men get their commanders attention sometimes.

I've been concerned myself about the lack of armed escort. This convoy wasn't hit, but others certainly are.

From my point of view, I have been disturbed about the lack of security for civilian workers there. I assumed at the beginning that guys going over to aid in reconstruction would be a high priority for army protection, but it seems that their companies have total responsibility for security, and the army does not consider itself responsible.

So the companies hire a few ex-soldiers to ride shotgun, and of course thats the first vehicle hit.

The engineers who were killed recently had arab guards. When your guards are arabs living out in the neighborhood, unprotected, they are themselves vulnerable. Even if they are inclined to be loyal, its too easy to visit them at home, and tell them not to go to work tomorrow.

Thats apparently what happened. They stopped showing up for work, and the engineers themselves told their colleagues they thought they were next. Why they didn't just camp out at their workplace, I'll never know, the decision to go home anyway cost them their heads.

Anyway, I wouldn't mind going if I am on the army's priority list, I wouldn't mind running the same risks alongside them, but I have qualms about going if they do not intend to protect me at all.


17 posted on 10/16/2004 5:00:50 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: valleygal

Article didn't mention, but Fox was playing the tape of the phone call one of these twerps left on her mother's phone recorder.

It was very un-professional sounding.


18 posted on 10/16/2004 5:02:15 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
Regarding the "tainted fuel", they were apparantly informed of that condition by an earlier "customer" who did have such specific knowledge.

Transportation folks should be at least smart enough to believe the experts, eh?!

19 posted on 10/16/2004 5:02:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: konaice

So did the new unit deliver the tainted helicopter fuel?


20 posted on 10/16/2004 5:03:30 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-456 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson